Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com
IntroductionArthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly procedure which are done by orthopedic surgeons, ACL is one of the most commonly disrupted ligaments in the knee injuries and is a common cause of knee instability [1][2][3].This ligament consists of two functional fiber components. These are named by the site which they attach on the tibia, the anteromedial and posterolateral bundle. With knee extension, the posterolateral one is tight and the anteromedial bundle is relaxed. Since ACL deficient knee causes limitation to activity because of symptomatic instability and high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, the most common method of treatment in these injuries is an ACL reconstruction [4,5]. In some literature the estimated failure rate after this surgery reports approximately 10%.The probable problems of the arthroscopic reconstruction procedure included graft failure, femoral and tibial tunnel mismatch, interference screw fixation divergence, and posterior cortex destruction, graft laceration by the screw threads and graft impingement by non-anatomic tunnel placement.Some literature has revealed that there is no significant difference in mid-terms follow-up results in functional and radiographic scores between one or two incision approach, but they didn't compare the placement of femoral tunnels. In the recent reports they showed that Anatomical ACL graft positioning seems to be an important factor for postoperative knee function and stability in ACL reconstruction [1,4].On the other hand, since the location of femoral tunnels for ACL replacement grafts remains a subject of debate [6] so, we conducted this study by the aim of knee stability evaluation and functional outcome following ACL reconstruction by two different femoral tunnel positions.
Materials and MethodsIn this prospective experimental study, the patients were referred to 3 referral orthopedics and trauma centers because of ACL tear which need to surgery. Between January 2000 to July 2003, 472 documents of ACL tear which were reconstructed
Materials and methods:In the current study, 472 patient s documents with ACL tear which were scheduled for reconstruction existed. By exclusion criteria, during the period January 2000 to July 2003, 159 total participants (147 men, 12women) were enrolled and were classified non-randomly in 2groups by the femoral tunnel position which all of them were operated arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction.Results: In our study 159 patients (147 male and 12 female) were participated. In the first group which femoral tunnel were placed at 11 o'clock position (right knee) and 1 o'clock (left knee), we found 28 cases with normal and 53 cases with varus and in the second group which femoral tunnel were placed at 10 o'clock position (right knee) and 2 o'clock position (left knee), we find 32 cases with normal and other 46 patients with varus mal alignment.
Conclusion:We found no significant difference between the 10 and 11o'c...