2008
DOI: 10.1002/qsar.200710117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Estimation Models for Biodegradation

Abstract: This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of in silico methods for estimating the readily biodegradability of organic chemicals, and describes their (potential) applicability in the identification of chemicals that are persistent or very persistent in the environment, such as Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs). The paper is based on an in-depth review performed by the European Chemicals Bureau (ECB) of the European Commissions Joint Research Centre in support of the development of technical guidance for the im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,10,14,20,44 These models provided reliable predictions within narrow AD, but they could not be applied widely due to the narrow AD. 45 We constructed the combinatorial classification models based on the largest heterogeneous data set of 1604 unique compounds so far, including 817 unpublished molecules with the numerical BOD value in Supporting Information Table S1 and Figure 1B. The range of the overall predictive accuracy was 74.1−100.0% for the external validation set using the seven best combinational global models and consensus model ( Table 5).…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Modeling and Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,10,14,20,44 These models provided reliable predictions within narrow AD, but they could not be applied widely due to the narrow AD. 45 We constructed the combinatorial classification models based on the largest heterogeneous data set of 1604 unique compounds so far, including 817 unpublished molecules with the numerical BOD value in Supporting Information Table S1 and Figure 1B. The range of the overall predictive accuracy was 74.1−100.0% for the external validation set using the seven best combinational global models and consensus model ( Table 5).…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Modeling and Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biodegradation is a complex chemical and biological process consisting of many steps, which depend not only on the amount and structure of the chemical, but also on environmental conditions into which the chemical is released. 45 It is very difficult to explain the biodegradation mechanism using individual or several simple chemical descriptors. Visualization Analysis of Substructure Alerts for Chemical Biodegradation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Modeling and Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were no HAPs in the common category of log K ow ≥ 4 and BCF ≥ 500, which were the criteria of chronic exposures and bioconcentration potentials when trivial HAPs were exposed for a long period of time, indicating that potentials of the bioconcentration are considered to be low. [31][32][33] We also analyzed the estimated soil organic carbon-water partition coefficient (K oc ) possessing quantitative relationships of K ow .…”
Section: -30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistence was addressed using BIOWIN v4.10 model to predict the biodegradation and the Level III fugacity model to provide predictions of environmental partitioning (percentage in each media) of chemicals between air, water, soil and sediment. These models are widely used and accepted by regulatory agencies and authorities for the identification of chemicals with PBT potential [7,12,13]. …”
Section: (Q)sars Models and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%