2020
DOI: 10.1002/jhrm.21396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of disclosure and apology literature: Gaps and needs

Abstract: A review of the literature related to the disclosure movement was conducted to find gaps and needs while identifying areas where needs are being met. There are several articles that address claims and other economic factors. Moreover, there are many papers that define barriers to disclosure with suggested workarounds. There is also a wealth of training content that teaches how to say “sorry.” However, gaps and needs were identified. The “gap list” was developed with a focus on concepts that are novel or not me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the survey did not evaluate how limited resources (funding, staff) faced by some state medical boards may impact thinking and decisions regarding disclosure and apology. Indeed, fear of under-resourced state medical boards viewing disclosing/apologizing physicians as easy targets is a part of the reported hesitancy for transparency post event, [1][2][3][4] yet the responses from the boards that responded to this study did not indicate this is a valid concern. Nonetheless, future research could involve interviews and review specific cases along with attempting to query the nonresponding boards to acquire a deeper, more granular understanding of the issues presented in this paper.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the survey did not evaluate how limited resources (funding, staff) faced by some state medical boards may impact thinking and decisions regarding disclosure and apology. Indeed, fear of under-resourced state medical boards viewing disclosing/apologizing physicians as easy targets is a part of the reported hesitancy for transparency post event, [1][2][3][4] yet the responses from the boards that responded to this study did not indicate this is a valid concern. Nonetheless, future research could involve interviews and review specific cases along with attempting to query the nonresponding boards to acquire a deeper, more granular understanding of the issues presented in this paper.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The disclosure and apology movement, also sometimes known as CANDOR or communication and resolution programs (CRP), is gaining traction in American healthcare organizations. [1][2][3][4] Disclosure/CRP is becoming the ethically expected response to adverse medical events, including medical errors, however, there are barriers to implementing disclosure/CRP programs and sustaining them. 5 One stumbling block for American physicians is fear of reporting cases and settlements to state medical boards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patchwork of so-called “apology laws” in American states was not taken into consideration in the design of this experiment, as many disclosure experts and advocates agree apology laws can offer some encouragement with the development of disclosure programs but said laws are not necessary for successful administration of disclosure programs. 1 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been no measurement or survey about what is being taught about disclosure/CRP in American medical schools. 1 To learn what is being taught about disclosure/CRP in the medical school curriculum, this first-of-a-kind study surveyed deans and curriculum leaders of America's 178 medical schools (Medical Doctor & Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) on this topic. A survey was also sent to a commercial list of fourth year American medical students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parents also reported appreciation of the openness of providers about provided care and that this openness and transparency would make them less likely to hold providers responsible for medical errors, a mechanism that is confirmed by studies about disclosing medical errors. 27 As such, reviewing recordings of neonatal resuscitation with parents can be valuable for parental coping and can enhance the parentprovider relationship.…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%