2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2006.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of coupling methods for non-matching meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
106
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This motivates the implementation of interpolation between non-matching discretizations. It should be noted that the interpolation of fields on the non-matching interface may compromise the accuracy of the whole simulation [46], and several authors have addressed the problem of coupling two non-matching discretizations [1,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. The general criteria for choosing the appropriate interpolator relates to its efficiency, robustness, accuracy, and conservation of momentum and energy [1,46,49,52].…”
Section: Spatial Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This motivates the implementation of interpolation between non-matching discretizations. It should be noted that the interpolation of fields on the non-matching interface may compromise the accuracy of the whole simulation [46], and several authors have addressed the problem of coupling two non-matching discretizations [1,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. The general criteria for choosing the appropriate interpolator relates to its efficiency, robustness, accuracy, and conservation of momentum and energy [1,46,49,52].…”
Section: Spatial Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common approach in the literature to apply the principle of virtual work [1,46,49,53] to define a conservative transfer scheme. Brown [52] and Farhat [1] have introduced projection methods that apply the conservation of virtual work to the problem of transferring load and deformations in FSI problems on non-matching meshes.…”
Section: Spatial Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As coupling method in this paper, we take the radial basis function method(RBF) with large compact support. This method, favored by [1], because of its accuracy and efficiency, does not need orthogonal projection or search algorithms. The coupling between fluid and structure equations arises from the dynamic and kinematic boundary conditions(BC) at the fluid-structure interface.…”
Section: Non-matching Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Boer et al [1] gives a detailed study of data transfer methods, and FSI simulations are performed on non-matching meshes. As coupling method in this paper, we take the radial basis function method(RBF) with large compact support.…”
Section: Non-matching Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%