2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2023.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of Conservation Challenges and Possible Solutions for Grassland Birds of the North American Great Plains

Jacy S. Bernath-Plaisted,
Maureen D. Correll,
Scott G. Somershoe
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 321 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This included C 4 mid-grass species, such as Bouteloua curtipendula and Panicum obtusum, that are valued as forage for cattle. However, it also included other C 4 mid-grass species, such as Aristida purpurea, Bothriochloa laguroides, Hilaria mutica, and Sporobolus compositus, that are not optimal for cattle grazing but are valuable for other grassland ecosystem services, such as wildlife cover, grassland obligate bird species, soil stability, wind erosion mitigation, and/or carbon sequestration [36][37][38]40,54]. Since gains in C 4 mid-grass cover under certain clipping and fire treatments were greater in Nassella than in Buchloe patches, we hypothesize that the potential for the landscape-scale transition towards C 4 mid-grasses under the right combination of fire and defoliation from grazing may depend, in part, on the percentage of the total area dominated by Nassella.…”
Section: Responses In Nassella Patchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This included C 4 mid-grass species, such as Bouteloua curtipendula and Panicum obtusum, that are valued as forage for cattle. However, it also included other C 4 mid-grass species, such as Aristida purpurea, Bothriochloa laguroides, Hilaria mutica, and Sporobolus compositus, that are not optimal for cattle grazing but are valuable for other grassland ecosystem services, such as wildlife cover, grassland obligate bird species, soil stability, wind erosion mitigation, and/or carbon sequestration [36][37][38]40,54]. Since gains in C 4 mid-grass cover under certain clipping and fire treatments were greater in Nassella than in Buchloe patches, we hypothesize that the potential for the landscape-scale transition towards C 4 mid-grasses under the right combination of fire and defoliation from grazing may depend, in part, on the percentage of the total area dominated by Nassella.…”
Section: Responses In Nassella Patchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of larger C 4 mid-grasses in SGP grasslands increases landscape structural heterogeneity that enhances species diversity and ecosystem services. The numerous grass species within this type (see Appendix A) enhance the habitat for gallinaceous and other grassland obligate bird species [37,38] and cover for other wildlife species, including Odocoileus virginianus (white-tailed deer) and Antilocapra americana (pronghorn antelope) [11]. The greater root mass of C 4 mid-grasses compared to Buchloe or Nassella may also increase the potential for carbon sequestration and more diverse soil microbiomes [12,13,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%