Creative Construction Conference 2018 - Proceedings 2018
DOI: 10.3311/ccc2018-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of collusion and bid rigging detection methods in the construction industry

Abstract: Collusion and bid rigging are deplorable practices, forbidden by law. They are harmful to the society and dangerous for a free market economy. Due to the high value of construction industry production and the importance of the time factor, anti-competitive behaviour in that sector can result in losses extremely significant for the national economy. Effective elimination of cartels and bid rigging requires detection, prosecution and successful penalization of cartels. Disrupting already existing cartels and det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries that support free-market economy have established stringent laws to curtail this practice and suggest designing the tender process to maximize participation (OECD, 2013). Researchers like Foremny and Dorabialski (2018) say that one practical way to prevent collusion is to expand the list of potential bidders by inviting a wider group of qualified subcontractors or suppliers to participate, as was also evident in this study. Further to ensure this practice, they suggest that effective competition can be enhanced if a sufficient number of credible bidders are able to respond to the invitation to tender and have an incentive to compete for the contract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries that support free-market economy have established stringent laws to curtail this practice and suggest designing the tender process to maximize participation (OECD, 2013). Researchers like Foremny and Dorabialski (2018) say that one practical way to prevent collusion is to expand the list of potential bidders by inviting a wider group of qualified subcontractors or suppliers to participate, as was also evident in this study. Further to ensure this practice, they suggest that effective competition can be enhanced if a sufficient number of credible bidders are able to respond to the invitation to tender and have an incentive to compete for the contract.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Scholarly sources that present approaches that may have prevented costly litigation. Foremny (2018) classified and presented a brief description of the bid rigging and collusion factors existing, in addition to giving the thoughts to the realization of the idea in combining AI (Artificial Intelligence) and BIM (Building Information Modelling), to detect collusion and bid rigging within associative tenders.…”
Section: Instruction To Tenderersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research will be guided along the lines of the events that EMBD claimed has occurred that rendered the contracts void and unenforceable and investigated the contractual wrong doings and examine possible remedies that could have been utilized to avoid costly litigations. Foremny (2018) added that "it is detrimental to society and to the free market economy". Anticompetitive behaviour in the construction industry can result in considerable losses for the national economy due to the high value of its output and the relevance of the time factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of collusion and bid rigging has been a subject of many studies, i. a. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Construction industry, including road construction is an important and capital-consuming branch of world economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%