2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3606-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of chemical signature databases

Abstract: This review assesses the current state of chemical signature databases, the primary characteristics that determine their applicability, characterization of their capability to support spectral identifications, and the target audience to which they are directed. Database file formats, spectrometer operating conditions, and spectral matching tools are found to be primary characteristics that determine the applicability of databases and their ability to support spectral identifications. Chemical signature databas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important aspect when working with spectral data is the need for spectral librariesa curated collection of reference spectra representing a wide range of compounds or materials, used for comparison and interpretation in spectral analysis. These reference spectra (of known materials/substances) are obtained under controlled conditions, ensuring their accuracy and reliability [28][29][30]. Currently, there are several commercial spectral databases that require an annual subscription for access, while, to a lesser degree, there are also several open access spectral libraries available, encompassing a diverse array of spectra sources from several different sub-disciplines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important aspect when working with spectral data is the need for spectral librariesa curated collection of reference spectra representing a wide range of compounds or materials, used for comparison and interpretation in spectral analysis. These reference spectra (of known materials/substances) are obtained under controlled conditions, ensuring their accuracy and reliability [28][29][30]. Currently, there are several commercial spectral databases that require an annual subscription for access, while, to a lesser degree, there are also several open access spectral libraries available, encompassing a diverse array of spectra sources from several different sub-disciplines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the libraries are device-dedicated, libraries on multiple systems need to be updated to respond to an emerging threat. 6,9 This updating causes redundancies in effort and expense that can affect response time and brings additional burdens associated with security, safety, and property rights. An alternative approach would be to make use of spectral data collected for this purpose in a standardized manner at a central facility (e.g., a government laboratory), if these data could be used in portable libraries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10,17 Considerable work on spectral standardization has been applied to improve long-term data archiving of reference libraries. 9 However, although long-term data archiving of Raman spectra is making progress toward developing transferable Raman spectral libraries, 6,9,10 these libraries are only now being adapted to handheld systems. The main difficulty is that handheld instruments use NIR lasers, and compact dispersive spectrometers with fast optics, and they are very susceptible to wavenumber calibration problems and relative intensity response, especially for small Raman wavenumber shifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison with reference spectra Today, one of the most common methods for the identification of compounds using mass spectrometry is the comparison with spectra of authentic standards. Libraries of mass spectra, especially the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database and the Wiley registry of mass spectral data, have been mentioned as part of a very broad review of chemical signature databases [23]. A summary is given in Table 2.…”
Section: Acquisition and Processing Of Tandem Ms Datamentioning
confidence: 99%