Abstract:Biopsy techniques have been developed to collect skin and blubber samples through non-lethal methods. One sample can provide data on genetics, prey preferences, foraging ecology, contaminant loads, and physiological processes. The limited data available suggest that biopsy wounds heal quickly and that there are usually no discernable adverse health effects. Published accounts on factors contributing to the success of collecting biopsy samples and the behavioral impacts to cetaceans following biopsy sampling we… Show more
“…To our knowledge no long-term negative effects of biopsy sampling on the behavior or health of any cetacean species have yet been reported (e.g. Noren and Mocklin, 2012;Tezanos-Pinto and Baker, 2012), even considering those living in a polluted environment (Jefferson and Hung, 2008). Our study supports these observations.…”
Section: Instant Reactions To Biopsy Sampling and Wound Healingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Weinrich et al, 1991;Krützen et al, 2002;Bilgmann et al, 2007;Noren and Mocklin, 2012). Skin samples have been used in genetic and stable isotope analyses addressing questions regarding stock identity, social structure, phylogeography and trophic ecology (e.g.…”
Cetacean biopsy sampling is a widely used technique with undisputable scientific value. Although it is generally considered as a harmless technique with no apparent long-lasting effects, studies have recommended examining behavioral responses to evaluate potential impacts on individuals, groups and sampled populations. In this study, we evaluated individual behavioral reactions and wound-healing in common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) during a biopsy sampling program carried out in southern Brazil from 2003 to 2012, and compared sampling effectiveness between dedicated and opportunistic sampling surveys. Two hundred and fiftytwo biopsy attempts were made, resulting in 118 hits (48% of attempts) and 134 samples (52% of attempts) collected successfully. Responses to biopsy sampling were low-level, of short-term duration, and elicited similar reactions on the dolphins, irrespective of shot distance, sex of individuals, dolphins’ group size and pre-behavioral state. Dolphins subjected to multiple biopsy attempts reacted in a similar manner as in previous attempt(s), with no evidence of increasing the intensity of the reaction. Wounds could be monitored in 18 animals and healed over 18 to 35 days. Generally, wounds appeared to be covered by epidermis in about three weeks with no observed signs of skin infection. Our results agree with previous studies suggesting that biopsy sampling does not cause significant disturbance to the behavior of dolphins. At a local level, this study demonstrates that biopsy sampling of bottlenose dolphins in the Patos Lagoon Estuary is more effective, less costly and less intrusive when conducted opportunistically, but that long-term sampling is required to achieve a relatively good sample size from photoidentified individuals in the population.
“…To our knowledge no long-term negative effects of biopsy sampling on the behavior or health of any cetacean species have yet been reported (e.g. Noren and Mocklin, 2012;Tezanos-Pinto and Baker, 2012), even considering those living in a polluted environment (Jefferson and Hung, 2008). Our study supports these observations.…”
Section: Instant Reactions To Biopsy Sampling and Wound Healingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Weinrich et al, 1991;Krützen et al, 2002;Bilgmann et al, 2007;Noren and Mocklin, 2012). Skin samples have been used in genetic and stable isotope analyses addressing questions regarding stock identity, social structure, phylogeography and trophic ecology (e.g.…”
Cetacean biopsy sampling is a widely used technique with undisputable scientific value. Although it is generally considered as a harmless technique with no apparent long-lasting effects, studies have recommended examining behavioral responses to evaluate potential impacts on individuals, groups and sampled populations. In this study, we evaluated individual behavioral reactions and wound-healing in common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) during a biopsy sampling program carried out in southern Brazil from 2003 to 2012, and compared sampling effectiveness between dedicated and opportunistic sampling surveys. Two hundred and fiftytwo biopsy attempts were made, resulting in 118 hits (48% of attempts) and 134 samples (52% of attempts) collected successfully. Responses to biopsy sampling were low-level, of short-term duration, and elicited similar reactions on the dolphins, irrespective of shot distance, sex of individuals, dolphins’ group size and pre-behavioral state. Dolphins subjected to multiple biopsy attempts reacted in a similar manner as in previous attempt(s), with no evidence of increasing the intensity of the reaction. Wounds could be monitored in 18 animals and healed over 18 to 35 days. Generally, wounds appeared to be covered by epidermis in about three weeks with no observed signs of skin infection. Our results agree with previous studies suggesting that biopsy sampling does not cause significant disturbance to the behavior of dolphins. At a local level, this study demonstrates that biopsy sampling of bottlenose dolphins in the Patos Lagoon Estuary is more effective, less costly and less intrusive when conducted opportunistically, but that long-term sampling is required to achieve a relatively good sample size from photoidentified individuals in the population.
“…These samples are collected from specialized darts that retain small (~6 × 15 mm) cores of the epidermis and distal dermis (blubber) layers of the skin (reviewed by Noren & Mocklin 2012). They are the biological samples most frequently collected from freeranging cetaceans and are often obtained in numbers suitable for estimates of population-level demographic parameters.…”
Bowhead whale Balaena mysticetus progesterone concentrations were measured in different sample matrices (serum, blubber, and urine) to investigate (1) concordance among sample type and (2) variation among life-history class. Samples were collected from subsistencehunted whales (n = 86) taken from 1999 to 2009. In general, irrespective of sample matrix, pregnant females had the highest concentrations by orders of magnitude, followed by mature animals of both sexes, and subadults had the lowest concentrations. Subadult males and females had similar progesterone concentrations in all sample matrices measured. When pregnant animals were included in our analyses, permuted regression models indicated a strong positive relationship between serum and blubber progesterone levels (r 2 = 0.894, p = 0.0002). When pregnant animals were not included, we found no significant relationship between serum and blubber levels (r 2 = 0.025, p = 0.224). These results suggest that progesterone concentrations are mirrored in these sample types over longer periods (i.e. on the order of weeks to months, time frame of reproductive changes) but not shorter periods (i.e. on the order of hours to days, time frame of daily fluctuations). This conclusion is consistent even for progesterone concentrations measured in females that had recently changed pregnancy states (either new mothers or newly pregnant animals), for which blubber progesterone levels seem to lag those in the serum. Finally, urine progesterone had statistically significant positive relationships with serum (r 2 = 0.136, p = 0.0460) and blubber progesterone (r 2 = 0.150, p = 0.0421). Our results suggest that progesterone concentrations first peak in the serum, then in the urine, and finally in the blubber.
“…However, one way to overcome this problem is to use individual identification by DNA profiling or microsatellite genotyping, which provides a permanent and unique record for every individual. Skin samples as a source of DNA can now be collected from free-ranging small cetaceans using a lightweight biopsy dart fired from a veterinary rifle with a variable pressure valve, ensuring minimum physical impact and behavioural response (Krützen et al 2002, Noren & Mocklin 2012. Systematic boat surveys were undertaken during February and March of 2 austral summers (2010 and 2011) on the west coast of New Zealand's North Island.…”
Maui's dolphin Cephalorhynchus hectori maui is one of the most endangered subspecies of mammals, and yet its ecology is poorly known, partly because of the difficulty in following individuals throughout their range and over time. Here we combined group sightings (n = 45) from 23 boat surveys and genotype recaptures from biopsy samples (n = 73, 20 microsatellite loci) collected over 2 summers (2010 and 2011) to investigate along-shore distribution, group characteristics and individual movements of Maui's dolphins. We found a clumped distribution extending along 139 km of coastline, with the highest density of dolphins between Manukau Harbour and south of Port Waikato, New Zealand. As recapture events (n = 32) revealed movements throughout most of their range, we suggest that the clumped distribution is driven by patchy food resources and/or social factors rather than by site fidelity. Mean group size was 4.7 (SD = 3.0), with several large aggregations (≥8 dolphins) containing a higher proportion of calves than smaller groups and thus probably acting as nursery groups. Group composition by sex was different in large and small groups, with more adult females in large groups. The majority of small groups contained individuals of both sexes, which contrasts with the pattern of sex segregation described in the South Island, New Zealand. A conservative estimate indicates that the mean along-shore range for Maui's dolphins is at least 35.5 km, suggesting similarity to Hector's dolphins. However, some aspects of Maui's dolphin ecology as described here might have been affected by the recent history of population decline and low abundance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.