2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review of activated carbon adsorbent material for textile dyes removal: Preparation, and modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1/n value of the Freundlich model indicates the heterogeneity of the system, with a lower value indicating a higher degree of heterogeneity. [24] The K F constant, as determined for the Freundlich isotherm, represents the strength of the interactions between the adsorbate and the adsorbent. [25] An increased value for this parameter indicates a higher adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, thus facilitating the removal of the chemical from the system.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Methyl Redmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1/n value of the Freundlich model indicates the heterogeneity of the system, with a lower value indicating a higher degree of heterogeneity. [24] The K F constant, as determined for the Freundlich isotherm, represents the strength of the interactions between the adsorbate and the adsorbent. [25] An increased value for this parameter indicates a higher adsorption capacity of the adsorbent, thus facilitating the removal of the chemical from the system.…”
Section: Adsorption Of Methyl Redmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used sorbents today are materials based on activated carbon. They show relatively high efficiency in binding dyes from wastewater [ 10 ], but are quite expensive. Therefore, cheaper alternatives are being sought.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different chemical compounds can be used as activators, such as phosphoric acid, zinc chloride, potassium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, and potassium hydroxide. Accordingly, the type of activator used dictates the nature of the adsorbent and its adsorption behaviour (Husien et al, 2022;Kim et al, 2020). Potassium carbonate is a better and safer activating agent than potassium hydroxide because it produces higher activated carbon yield, surface area, and pore volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potassium carbonate is a better and safer activating agent than potassium hydroxide because it produces higher activated carbon yield, surface area, and pore volume. Moreover, biochar produced by potassium carbonate has a higher capacity for the adsorption of larger molecules such as methylene blue (Husien et al, 2022). The use of iron (III) salt as a catalyst during biomass carbonisation facilitated the formation of an aromatic structure, which provided adsorption sites for polar and nonpolar organic contaminants from an aqueous solution (Han et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%