1983
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.141.5.865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review. Computed tomography of the postoperative lumbar spine

Abstract: Up to 30% of patients who have had lumbar surgery for herniated disk or for spondylolisthesis or spinal stenosis have unsatisfactory results [1 -4]. Postoperative symptoms are often quite similar to the preoperative pain and radicu lopathy, sometimes less intense but often more distressing than before surgery. Once it has been determined that the persistent and recurrent postoperative symptoms are not due to some form of musculoskeletal imbalance or strain, causes to be considered must include changes or compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Postoperative myelography often reveals a defect in the root sleeve at the operated site [22]. The effect may be caused by a recurrent disc herniation, scar tissue or arachnoiditis and the diagnostic value of myelography is insignificant [2,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative myelography often reveals a defect in the root sleeve at the operated site [22]. The effect may be caused by a recurrent disc herniation, scar tissue or arachnoiditis and the diagnostic value of myelography is insignificant [2,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic potential probably can be optimized by using additional pulse sequences, smaller slice thickness, and by use of axial slices. Moreover, the use of intravenous contrast enhancement with Gadolinium-DTPA seems promising 11 ' 16. The accuracy of CT to able to differentiate between recurrent disc herniation and scar tissue is reported to be high using contrast enhancement, while the results are more conflicting in unenhanced CT 2' 7, 17 19,21. CT has the advantage over MR!…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This "pseudomyelogram" pattern was presumably produced by the enhancement of uniform sheets of A large number of hypervascular intraspinal abnormalities are known to enhance on CT with intravenous contrast administration. These include primary and metastatic malignancies in all compartments [1], benign neoplasms (hemangioblastoma, meningioma, hemangioendothelioma) [2] vascular lesions (arteriovenous malformations, hemangioma, fibroangioma) [3], post-lamineetomy hypertrophic scar [4] and arachnoiditis due to a multiplicity of causes [5]. The focal nature of enhancement, in conjunction with the clinical data and myelographic findings, serves to correctly identify the majority of these lesions, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%