2019
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2019-310-rc2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review Comments for Zeng et al. gmd-2019-310

Abstract: This study presents an investigation of dust simulation sensitivity to three dry dust deposition schemes and two adaptations of widely used dust emission schemes using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem). The authors successfully demonstrate that airborne dust concentration and transport simulation can be sensitive to dry deposition process parameterization. Moreover, their findings make a compelling case that future efforts should focus on improving dry dust deposition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we shall investigate this galactic ionizing photon budget. Since star formation efficiency typically rises with halo mass within the range of masses we represent (not only in MNRAS 496, 4342-4357 (2020) CoDa II, but as generally expected, see Moster, Naab & White 2013;Legrand et al 2019), while the abundance of haloes decreases with halo mass (e.g. see the halo mass functions of Sheth, Mo & Tormen 2001;Watsonetal.2013), the mass range of contributing haloes may, in principle, be broad, with a maximum contribution from haloes that, at different redshifts, may be anywhere within the broad range 10 8 M ⊙ < M halo < 10 12 M ⊙ .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In this work, we shall investigate this galactic ionizing photon budget. Since star formation efficiency typically rises with halo mass within the range of masses we represent (not only in MNRAS 496, 4342-4357 (2020) CoDa II, but as generally expected, see Moster, Naab & White 2013;Legrand et al 2019), while the abundance of haloes decreases with halo mass (e.g. see the halo mass functions of Sheth, Mo & Tormen 2001;Watsonetal.2013), the mass range of contributing haloes may, in principle, be broad, with a maximum contribution from haloes that, at different redshifts, may be anywhere within the broad range 10 8 M ⊙ < M halo < 10 12 M ⊙ .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Such models have been used to constrain the stellar mass -halo mass relation (e.g. Behroozi et al 2010;Moster et al 2010Moster et al , 2013Legrand et al 2019), though it has been noted that the efficacy of such methods is highly dependent on the observational selection function (Stiskalek et al 2021). Both these approaches are capable of modelling galaxy evolution over very large volumes, allowing predictions for the clustering of galaxies as well as their evolution in rare, overdense environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%