Review article: Use of renal registry data for research, health‐care planning and quality improvement: What can we learn from registry data in the Asia–Pacific region?

Abstract

SUMMARY:We review renal registry data from the Asia-Pacific region with an emphasis on their uses in health care and in dialysis care in particular. The review aims to demonstrate the information value of registry data. While renal registry provides a useful data resource for epidemiological research, there are severe methodological limitations in its application for analytical or therapeutic research. However, it is the use of renal registry data for public health and health-care management purposes that registry really comes into its own, and it is primarily for these that governments have invested in national patient and disease registries. We apply data from several renal registries in the Asia-Pacific region to illustrate its wide application for planning dialysis services, for evaluating dialysis practices and health outcomes, with a view to improving the quality of dialysis care. In the course of preparing the review, we have found that the quality and accessibility of renal registry data were highly variable across the region. Given the value of renal registry, every country in the Asia-Pacific region should establish one or should ensure that their current registries are better resourced and developed. Greater data sharing and collaboration among registries in the region could help advance the nephrology to serve our patients better.

Strengthening Renal Registries and ESRD Research in Africa

“…They also provide an excellent example of how registry data was used to argue for increased funding of RRT as their country's national wealth increased. 31 South America: The Latin American Dialysis and Transplant Registry has demonstrated that it is possible to establish and maintain a continental renal registry in difficult economic conditions. 32 Established in the early 1990s, this pan-Latin American partnership has contributed to the development of national registries and allowed countries to report their treatment rates and outcomes in the context of geographically, culturally and economically similar neighbours, challenging treatment modality preferences and highlighting the importance of primary and secondary prevention in CKD.…”

Design and implementation of the first nationwide, web-based Chinese Renal Data System (CNRDS)

“…There is an important responsibility for national renal registries to periodically publish data on the physiological and pathological condition of patients who are under dialysis treatment in an objective and anonymous fashion, as well as to enable the evaluation of the dialysis procedure and the prognosis of the patients. The variations in performance among dialysis providers are systematically documented in renal registries, which could be used for clinical audits to improve the quality of dialysis care [18]. The CNRDS was established for the above purposes, and it was expected to provide the information needed for public health, monitoring the safety of therapeutic products and services, and for clinical research.…”

National registries in developing countries: Understanding construction challenges and implementation steps

“…In help identify risk factors of a disease and high-risk population sub-groups [4]. Moreover, national registries provide valuable data for conducting research related to disease etiology, patient outcomes, and prognosis [5].…”