2023
DOI: 10.1111/apt.17622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review article: Translating STRIDE‐II into clinical reality – Opportunities and challenges

Abstract: SummaryBackgroundWith the introduction of novel therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), ‘treat‐to‐target’ strategies are increasingly discussed to improve short‐ and long‐term outcomes in patients with IBD.AimTo discuss opportunities and challenges of a treat‐to‐target approach in light of the current ‘Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease’ (STRIDE‐II) consensusMethodsThe 2021 update of STRIDE‐II encompasses 13 evidence‐ and consensus‐based recommendations for treat‐to‐target str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therapeutic studies demonstrated that the absence of symptoms was not capable of preventing the natural progression of IBD, thus, studies with an emphasis on clinical outcomes. Among numerous proposals, the proposal of the International Organization for IBD (IOIBD) is considered among the most relevant, which proposes target-directed therapy (Treat to Target—T2T) considering the short-term objectives (such as clinical response), medium-term (such as reduction in inflammatory markers), and long-term (such as mucosal healing) [ 16 , 22 ]. The same institution also proposes continuous care to patients with the proposal of the SPIRIT consensus, which warns about care in the different manifestations of the disease, even after controlling the inflammatory activity [ 23 ].…”
Section: Therapies and Therapeutic Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic studies demonstrated that the absence of symptoms was not capable of preventing the natural progression of IBD, thus, studies with an emphasis on clinical outcomes. Among numerous proposals, the proposal of the International Organization for IBD (IOIBD) is considered among the most relevant, which proposes target-directed therapy (Treat to Target—T2T) considering the short-term objectives (such as clinical response), medium-term (such as reduction in inflammatory markers), and long-term (such as mucosal healing) [ 16 , 22 ]. The same institution also proposes continuous care to patients with the proposal of the SPIRIT consensus, which warns about care in the different manifestations of the disease, even after controlling the inflammatory activity [ 23 ].…”
Section: Therapies and Therapeutic Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing studies demonstrate that approximately 50% of IBD patients can achieve MH without a T2T strategy, with specific rates dependent on the intervention, definition of MH, and time of assessment [33]. There are currently no data comparing the rates of achieving MH between a T2T and symptom-based approach to IBD management.…”
Section: Evidence Of Treat-to-target Strategies Incorporating Serial ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where MH is often not achieved, decisions to escalate treatment will need to be weighed against the relative paucity of therapeutic options available, particularly for patients in symptomatic remission who are otherwise clinically well. Randomised, controlled data are needed, demonstrating the long-term effects of MH before a treatment approach ultimately geared towards MH can be incorporated into real-world clinical practice [33]. Further, clear, evidence-based recommendations are needed for cases where MH is unable to be achieved despite adequately directed therapy.…”
Section: Effect On Therapeutic Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kedia and Ahuja for their insightful comments and for highlighting additional shortcomings in the management of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). 1,2 Despite new therapeutic options, we still cannot achieve the desired long-term outcomes of steroid-free remission, mucosal and transmural healing, prevention of invalidity and disability, unimpaired quality of life and avoidance of long-term therapy-related adverse events in all patients with IBD. 3 They pointed out important differences in the natural disease course, monitoring and treatment strategies of CD and UC and suggested that CD may need a more aggressive approach.We agree that the current classification of IBD might be too simplistic to reflect the complexity and differences between the two diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank Drs. Kedia and Ahuja for their insightful comments and for highlighting additional shortcomings in the management of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) 1,2 . Despite new therapeutic options, we still cannot achieve the desired long‐term outcomes of steroid‐free remission, mucosal and transmural healing, prevention of invalidity and disability, unimpaired quality of life and avoidance of long‐term therapy‐related adverse events in all patients with IBD 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%