2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00774.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REVIEW ARTICLE: Tolerance Mechanisms in Pregnancy: A Reappraisal of the Role of Class I Paternal MHC Antigens*

Abstract: Suppression of pregnancy loss by paternal/embryo Class I MHC depends on the presence of paternal peptides. This greatly complicates existing models of Class I-KIR interactions in feto-maternal tolerance or rejection. It is important to consider all the data when devising explanatory models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(133 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also studies indicating that allo-immune abortus has been seen more often in cases where there is a difference in inhibiting KIR receptors (2DL1, 2DL2, 2DL3) between spouses and in women who has a limited number of KIR repertoire [2,20]. Flores et al [7] conducted similar studies in 30 couples and their findings supported that in recurrent miscarriage subjects, the balance between inhibitory and activating receptors present in natural killer cells is inclined toward an activating state that may contribute to pregnancy loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also studies indicating that allo-immune abortus has been seen more often in cases where there is a difference in inhibiting KIR receptors (2DL1, 2DL2, 2DL3) between spouses and in women who has a limited number of KIR repertoire [2,20]. Flores et al [7] conducted similar studies in 30 couples and their findings supported that in recurrent miscarriage subjects, the balance between inhibitory and activating receptors present in natural killer cells is inclined toward an activating state that may contribute to pregnancy loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three adhesion-related families were selected following the same strategy as for cadherin data set A: ADAM 22 (IPR006586-44 genes); integrins 23 (INTs, IPR000413-19 genes); and tyrosine kinases 24 (TKs, IPR008266-99 genes). Three families unrelated with cellular adhesion were also selected: ARF 25 (IPR006688-106 genes); MHC 26 (IPR011162-90 genes); and POU 27 (IPR013847-102 genes). From within all adhesion-related genes (n¼162 genes, derived from ADAM, INT and TK families), adhesion-unrelated genes (n¼298 genes, derived from ARF, MHC and POU families), 1000 randomized sets, of 104 genes each, were selected (because data set A included 104 genes).…”
Section: Total Intron Number Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,[8][9][10][11][12] In this section, we will briefly highlight the mechanisms involving the immune cells, both at the site and in the periphery, that contribute to the maintenance of tolerance at the FMI.…”
Section: Special Editionmentioning
confidence: 99%