2009
DOI: 10.1080/19397030903267431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Review and future of active disassembly

Abstract: Disassembly has been widely accepted as a disadvantageous end-of-life activity, but with increasing pressures from directives, such as waste on electrical and electronic equipment, and with increasing pressures to become sustainable disassembly is becoming necessary. Current disassembly methods, including both manual and automated disassembly, need improvements to meet this necessity. This paper will introduce the improvements needed and suggest through literature the validity of active disassembly (AD) to pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would especially be true for electronic products that are limited to 50-60°C in their operation or storage temperature. Based on these deficiencies with the heat-triggered SMP snap-fit, the need for a multi-trigger AD element may provide a better solution to accidental disassembly [22]. A multi-trigger AD element will 1) significantly limit accidental disassembly by requiring two or more unique environmental conditions for disassembly, 2) provide more control in the AD process with additional control parameters due to the multiple triggers, and 3) prevent product destruction by limiting the extreme conditions needed for single trigger AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would especially be true for electronic products that are limited to 50-60°C in their operation or storage temperature. Based on these deficiencies with the heat-triggered SMP snap-fit, the need for a multi-trigger AD element may provide a better solution to accidental disassembly [22]. A multi-trigger AD element will 1) significantly limit accidental disassembly by requiring two or more unique environmental conditions for disassembly, 2) provide more control in the AD process with additional control parameters due to the multiple triggers, and 3) prevent product destruction by limiting the extreme conditions needed for single trigger AD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages and disadvantages of manual and automated disassembly are shown in Table 1 adapted from Carrell et al 32 It can be seen that manual disassembly has low efficiency and high labour cost. Fully automated disassembly could deal with large volumes but is inflexible and would incur high capital costs.…”
Section: Human–robot Collaborative Disassemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fully automated disassembly could deal with large volumes, it lacks flexibility and requires high capital investment. Fully automated disassembly is unable to handle the uncertainties and variances associated with EoL products and disassembly processes [23,24]. HRC disassembly, a semi-autonomous disassembly method, has greater potential to afford both efficiency and flexibility.…”
Section: Hrc Disassemblymentioning
confidence: 99%