2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0954394504163047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversing the trajectory of language change: Subject–verb agreement with be in New Zealand English

Abstract: This article examines the historical evolution of subject-verb concord in New Zealand English. We investigate the usage of the singular form of be with plural NP subjects (existentials and nonexistentials) over the past 150 years. The results demonstrate that the New Zealand English subject-verb concord system has undergone considerable reorganization during this time. Singular concord in nonexistentials occurred in early New Zealand English, but is now largely absent. In existentials, it steadily declined dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Tagliamonte (1998) indicates that the presence of sentence negation disfavors the absence of agreement. This is also the effect that is generally documented in the U.S. (Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012), but in New Zealand English polarity does not seem to constrain the variation (Hay & Schreier 2004). In turn, for tense, contractedness, and distance, similar results have been documented in English worldwide: the present tense, the full forms of to be, and shorter distances between to be and its noun favor agreement over its absence (e.g., Hay & Schreier 2004;Crawford 2005;Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012).…”
Section: (9)supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Tagliamonte (1998) indicates that the presence of sentence negation disfavors the absence of agreement. This is also the effect that is generally documented in the U.S. (Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012), but in New Zealand English polarity does not seem to constrain the variation (Hay & Schreier 2004). In turn, for tense, contractedness, and distance, similar results have been documented in English worldwide: the present tense, the full forms of to be, and shorter distances between to be and its noun favor agreement over its absence (e.g., Hay & Schreier 2004;Crawford 2005;Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012).…”
Section: (9)supporting
confidence: 66%
“…This is also the effect that is generally documented in the U.S. (Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012), but in New Zealand English polarity does not seem to constrain the variation (Hay & Schreier 2004). In turn, for tense, contractedness, and distance, similar results have been documented in English worldwide: the present tense, the full forms of to be, and shorter distances between to be and its noun favor agreement over its absence (e.g., Hay & Schreier 2004;Crawford 2005;Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012). As for the language-external covariates of this alternation, research supports that non-agreement is more common in informal registers and appears to correspond to an ongoing change towards non-agreement ( Tagliamonte & Baayen 2012).…”
Section: (9)mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…For example Hay and Schreier (2004) demonstrate that the use of singular concord in existential constructions declined in NZ until around 1900, and then steadily increased, and is relatively common today. Gordon et al (2004) and Schreier et al (2004) show that the use of [hw] in words like which and whistle increased in early New Zealand English, and then reversed its trajectory around 1900.…”
Section: The Give Model Across Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, dialects frequently undergo syntactic change, where the usage of a particular variant dramatically increases or decreases (see e.g. Hay and Schreier 2004 for changing verb agreement patterns in New Zealand English). A probabilistic, usage-based approach to grammar is able to account for such variation by assuming that different communities differ in the types and frequencies of the constructions that they are exposed to.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feagin 1979;Eisikovits 1991;Meechan & Foley 1994; Britain & Sudbury 2002;Hay & Schreier 2004;Rupp 2005;Walker 2007; Cheshire & Fox 2009), as well as our preliminary analyses of the variation in the Bequia corpus. These factor groups are outlined in (6)-(9), with an example provided for each factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%