2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversing opinions on Dollo’s Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
159
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
159
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, Dulichia and its allied genera have been considered to form a sister group of the Caprellidea on the basis of morphological characters (Laubitz 1979;Takeuchi 1993), but our previous molecular phylogenetic study did not support that idea and suggested that the reduction of pereopods might have occurred independently in the Caprellidea and Dulichia (Ito et al 2008). On the other hand, several recent phylogenetic or developmental studies claimed that reacquisition of several complex characters might have occurred, such as the wings of stick insects, digits of lizards, feeding larval stage of marine snails (Collin et al 2007;Collin and Miglietta 2008;Kohlsdorf and Wagner 2006;Whiting et al 2003). Because caprellids have fully developed first, second, and fifth to seventh pereopods, it is not improbable that the gene regulation system that produces pereopods could have been re-recruited to the third and fourth pereopods in the Phtisicidae.…”
Section: Regaining or Multiple Losses Of Third And Fourth Pereopods Amentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, Dulichia and its allied genera have been considered to form a sister group of the Caprellidea on the basis of morphological characters (Laubitz 1979;Takeuchi 1993), but our previous molecular phylogenetic study did not support that idea and suggested that the reduction of pereopods might have occurred independently in the Caprellidea and Dulichia (Ito et al 2008). On the other hand, several recent phylogenetic or developmental studies claimed that reacquisition of several complex characters might have occurred, such as the wings of stick insects, digits of lizards, feeding larval stage of marine snails (Collin et al 2007;Collin and Miglietta 2008;Kohlsdorf and Wagner 2006;Whiting et al 2003). Because caprellids have fully developed first, second, and fifth to seventh pereopods, it is not improbable that the gene regulation system that produces pereopods could have been re-recruited to the third and fourth pereopods in the Phtisicidae.…”
Section: Regaining or Multiple Losses Of Third And Fourth Pereopods Amentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Astyanax mexicanus | transgenic T hat complex traits do not reappear once lost is a macroevolutionary pattern of sufficient generality to have been proposed independently as "Dollo's Law" (1,2) and the "Law of Loss" (3). This pattern is frequently interpreted as evidence of a constraint on adaptive evolution resulting from the loss of genetic information required for trait development (2,4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern is frequently interpreted as evidence of a constraint on adaptive evolution resulting from the loss of genetic information required for trait development (2,4,5). Such information loss in the form of pseudogene formation has been documented (5), but most examples involve traits with relatively direct connections of genotype to phenotype, such as floral pigment (6) and hemoglobin (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dollo reconstruction is quite simple and fast to compute, again by dynamic programming, and is still widely used to infer ancestral states in phylogenetic studies, even if the irreversibility hypothesis is still controversial [5,1].…”
Section: Louis Dollo (1893)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular there is no maximum parsimonious reconstruction assigning 1 to the right child of the root node (with 1-threshold 1 5 ) without assigning the same state to the left child (with 1-threshold 1 3 ) in the tree of Figure 6, unless we relax the assumption that the cost parameters do not change along the tree.…”
Section: Louis Dollo (1893)mentioning
confidence: 99%