2020
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202012848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversibly Photo‐Modulating Mechanical Stiffness and Toughness of Bioengineered Protein Fibers

Abstract: Light-responsive materials have been extensively studied due to the attractive possibility of manipulating their properties with high spatiotemporal control in a non-invasive fashion. This stimulated the development of a series of photodeformable smart devices. However, it remained a challenge to reversibly modulate the stiffness and toughness of bulk materials. Here, we present bioengineered protein fibers and their optomechanical manipulation by employing electrostatic interactions between supercharged polyp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SUPs were derived from elastin‐like polypeptides, consisting dominantly of repetitive pentapeptide sequences with the primary structure (VPGXG) n , in which the fourth position X is occupied by lysine (K) or glutamic acid (E). These SUPs were produced by recombinant DNA technology and expressed in E. Coli [20–22] . A series of SUPs were produced with different chain lengths and charges, including K18, K72, K108, E36, E72, and E144.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SUPs were derived from elastin‐like polypeptides, consisting dominantly of repetitive pentapeptide sequences with the primary structure (VPGXG) n , in which the fourth position X is occupied by lysine (K) or glutamic acid (E). These SUPs were produced by recombinant DNA technology and expressed in E. Coli [20–22] . A series of SUPs were produced with different chain lengths and charges, including K18, K72, K108, E36, E72, and E144.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These SUPs were produced by recombinant DNA technology and expressed in E. Coli . [ 20 , 21 , 22 ] A series of SUPs were produced with different chain lengths and charges, including K18, K72, K108, E36, E72, and E144. The letter code denotes positive (K) or negative (E) variants while the digit indicates the number of charged amino acid residues (Figures 1 A and S1–S2, Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These SUPs were produced by recombinant DNAtechnology and expressed in E. Coli. [20][21][22] Aseries of SUPs were produced with different chain lengths and charges,including K18, K72, K108, E36, E72, and E144. Thel etter code denotes positive (K) or negative (E) variants while the digit indicates the number of charged amino acid residues (Figures 1A and S1-S2, Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by DNA recombinant technology (Figure 3A). [42][43][44][45][46] The high net charge of SUPs is encoded in the pentapeptide repeat unit (VPGXG) n in which X is substituted by a lysine residue (K) or a glutamic acid (E). Therefore, the highly charged SUPs allow them electrostatically complexed with opposite charged surfactants, resulting in the formation of coacervate-based biomaterials.…”
Section: Elp-surfactant Adhesivesmentioning
confidence: 99%