2008
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2008.2001984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Watermarking Based on Invariability and Adjustment on Pixel Pairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods in [4] and [9] embed data by using pixel difference modification, which is similar with the proposed method. The superiority of the proposed method compared with [4] and [9] is thus mainly due to the compensation effect. The embedding capacity in Table 5 is the largest number of bits that can be embedded under the biggest modification of 1 to the pixel values of host image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both methods in [4] and [9] embed data by using pixel difference modification, which is similar with the proposed method. The superiority of the proposed method compared with [4] and [9] is thus mainly due to the compensation effect. The embedding capacity in Table 5 is the largest number of bits that can be embedded under the biggest modification of 1 to the pixel values of host image.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As can be seen in Table 5, the proposed method 2 has larger embedding capacity than the proposed method 1 for all test images. Our method can embed much more bits than [4] and with higher marked image quality. For example, the proposed method 1 can embed 48,731 bits into Lena with PSNR 50.83 dB, their method can only embed 38,562 bits with PSNR 48.82 dB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations