2014
DOI: 10.1021/cm502268u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Lithium Storage at Highly Populated Vacant Sites in an Amorphous Vanadium Pentoxide Electrode

Abstract: A vanadium pentoxide electrode is prepared in the amorphous form (a-V2O5), and its electrode performances are compared to those for its crystalline counterpart (c-V2O5). The a-V2O5 electrode outperforms c-V2O5 in several ways. First, it is free from irreversible phase transitions and Li trapping, which evolve in c-V2O5, probably due to the lack of interactions between the inserted Li+ ions/electrons and V2O5 matrix. Second, the absence of Li trapping allows a reversible capacity amounting to >600 mA h g–1, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low crystallization has been shown to accelerate the lithium ion interaction in the bulk. 17,18 The lattice constants calculated from the X-ray diffraction results were a = 5.454, b = 6.322 and c = 4.954 Å for pristine LVO and a = 5.543, b = 6.323 and c = 4.965 Å for Ni-LVO. The change in lattice constants could be derived from the larger radius of Ni 2+ (0.69 Å) than V 5+ (0.54 Å), thus suggesting the incorporation of nickel into the LVO crystal structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Low crystallization has been shown to accelerate the lithium ion interaction in the bulk. 17,18 The lattice constants calculated from the X-ray diffraction results were a = 5.454, b = 6.322 and c = 4.954 Å for pristine LVO and a = 5.543, b = 6.323 and c = 4.965 Å for Ni-LVO. The change in lattice constants could be derived from the larger radius of Ni 2+ (0.69 Å) than V 5+ (0.54 Å), thus suggesting the incorporation of nickel into the LVO crystal structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The large number of under-coordinated atoms (good electron acceptors) and reactive sites at the surface means that amorphous materials also have the advantage over crystalline ones in their contact with the electrolyte and active substances (electron donors), which favors electrochemical processes. In regard to the merits discussed above, amorphous nanomaterials have already demonstrated their superior performance over bulk crystalline materials in various electrochemical applications, including lithium-and/or sodium-ion batteries [51,62,66,71,79,84,[96][97][98][99][100], super-or pseudo-capacitors [77,78,83], electrochemical water splitting [59] and sensors [72,81]. The amorphous CoSnO 3 @C nanoboxes reported by Wang et al [79] showed high initial discharge and charge capacities of around 1,410 and 480 mA h g −1 , respectively, as revealed in Fig.…”
Section: Applications Electrochemical Electrode Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,46] As exemplified in some reports, some amorphous aerogels or xerogel prepared are featured with low density, highly porous and high surface area and are being explored as new promising materials in electrochemistry. [47][48][49][50][51] Gao et al demonstrated amorphous V 2 O 5 exhibited superior Na storage performance compared with its crystalline counterpart. [52] No distinctive peak can be observed when the cyclic voltammetry (CV) scan was conducted on this amorphous V 2 O 5 , however the current response was scaled with the potential and was even greater than that of the crystalline counterpart.…”
Section: Amorphous V 2 Omentioning
confidence: 99%