2023
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2023.3238549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversible Data Hiding in Encrypted Images Based on Time-Varying Huffman Coding Table

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with Qiu et al's method [44], the proposed method can achieve a gain of 0.007, 0.032, 0.090, 0.098 and 0.015 bpp over Qiu et al's method [44] for the five images. As for Yang et al's method [45], our gains are 0.051, 0.066, 0.137, 0.065 and 0.053 bpp for the five images. &KHQDQG&KDQJ>@ <LQHWDO>@ <LQHWDO>@ <LQHWDO>@ <XHWDO>@ 4LXHWDO>@ <DQJHWDO>@ 3URSRVHG Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Sota Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with Qiu et al's method [44], the proposed method can achieve a gain of 0.007, 0.032, 0.090, 0.098 and 0.015 bpp over Qiu et al's method [44] for the five images. As for Yang et al's method [45], our gains are 0.051, 0.066, 0.137, 0.065 and 0.053 bpp for the five images. &KHQDQG&KDQJ>@ <LQHWDO>@ <LQHWDO>@ <LQHWDO>@ <XHWDO>@ 4LXHWDO>@ <DQJHWDO>@ 3URSRVHG Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Sota Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Compared with [44], our gains are 0.080, 0.115 and 0.121 bpp for BOSS-Base, BOWS-2 and UCID datasets, respectively. The above results demonstrate that the proposed method has excellent embedding performance and outperforms the existing SOTA methods [38]- [45]. Moreover, the runtime comparison is conducted.…”
Section: Comparison With Sota Methodsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before going to the performance and security analysis of the proposed algorithm, we first explain the Quality assessment metrics used for critical analysis of the proposed algorithm shown in Table 3 55 – 57 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, scholars have proposed many RDH methods, and these algorithms can be broadly categorized into lossless compression (LC) [8][9][10], , difference expansion (DE) [11][12][13], histogram shifting (HS) [14][15][16] and prediction error expansion (PEE) [17][18][19][20][21]. Although these methods are designed from different perspectives, there are only two ultimate goals: to increase the embedding capacity and to reduce the distortion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%