2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-1833-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled on-line to estrogen receptor bioaffinity detection based on fluorescence polarization

Abstract: We describe the development and validation of a high-resolution screening (HRS) platform which couples gradient reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) on-line to estrogen receptor α (ERα) affinity detection using fluorescence polarization (FP). FP, which allows detection at high wavelengths, limits the occurrence of interference from the autofluorescence of test compounds in the bioassay. A fluorescein-labeled estradiol derivative (E2-F) was synthesized and a binding assay was optimize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both determination of biological activity and chemical characterization were performed in parallel during a single chromatographic run. A more complex screening approach combining RP-HPLC online to an ERα affinity detection system using fluorescence polarization has been recently described by Reinen et al [138]. This method is a sensitive screening platform for measuring the ERα binding affinities of individual components in mixtures.…”
Section: Online Lc-based Biochemical Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both determination of biological activity and chemical characterization were performed in parallel during a single chromatographic run. A more complex screening approach combining RP-HPLC online to an ERα affinity detection system using fluorescence polarization has been recently described by Reinen et al [138]. This method is a sensitive screening platform for measuring the ERα binding affinities of individual components in mixtures.…”
Section: Online Lc-based Biochemical Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously identified with NMR by Ambrus et al[48]. 15␤) 1 15. 1.20 (m, 1 H, 14␣) 1.20-1.27 (m, 1 H, 11␤) 1.34-1.42 (m, 1 H, 8␤) 1.43-1.49 (m, 1 H, 1␣) 1.50-1.55 (m, 1 H, 12␤) 1.59-1.67 (m, 1 H, 12␣) 1.74-1.79 (m, 1 H, 7␤) 1.79-1.84 (m, 1 H, 11␣) 2.12-2.18 (m, 1 H, 15␣) 2.15-2.18 (m, 1 H, 10␤) 2.17-2.21 (m, 1 H, 1␤) 2.20-2.24 (m, 2 H, 2␣, 2␤) 2.23-2.32 (m, 1 H, 6␤) 2.36-2.45 (m, 1 H, 6␣) 3.94-4.00 (m, 1 H, 16␣) 4.64 (s, 1 H, OH) 5.26-5.27 (d, 1 H, 16␤OH) 5.72 (s, 1 H, 4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These receptor affinity detection (RAD) systems integrate liquid chromatography (LC) with affinity assessment and therefore allow the direct correlation between individual ligands and their affinity towards target proteins. Biochemical detection systems reported previously are based on fluorescence readout [12][13][14], fluorescent polarization [15] or mass spectrometry based reaction detection [16][17][18][19][20]. LC coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) is by far the most used tool in drug metabolism studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified protocol described by Reinen et al [ 34 ] was used for microsomal incubations. Pig liver microsomes (∼20 mg/mL protein) were diluted 1:10 in incubation buffer (50 mM KH 2 PO 4 buffer pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, and 5 activity units/mL glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) at 4 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%