2005
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-004-0491-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Separation, on Cellulose Chiral Stationary Phases, of the Stereoisomers of Methoxytetra-hydronaphthalene Derivatives, New Agonist and Antagonist Ligands for Melatonin Receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their chiral recognition abilities depend on the property, position, and number of substituents, and generally, the introduction of an electron-donating methyl group or an electron-withdrawing halogen at the 3-and/ or 4-position of the phenyl ring improves the chiral recognition ability for many racemates [24]. Hydrophobicity, electrostatic interaction, p -p interaction, hydrogen bonding, dipole -dipole interaction, and steric hindrance seem to be of major importance in enantioseparation mechanisms [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their chiral recognition abilities depend on the property, position, and number of substituents, and generally, the introduction of an electron-donating methyl group or an electron-withdrawing halogen at the 3-and/ or 4-position of the phenyl ring improves the chiral recognition ability for many racemates [24]. Hydrophobicity, electrostatic interaction, p -p interaction, hydrogen bonding, dipole -dipole interaction, and steric hindrance seem to be of major importance in enantioseparation mechanisms [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many chiral separations have been studied on polysaccharide CSPs and satisfactory mechanisms have been proposed. It is generally considered that some evocable reaction between the chiral stationary phase and the enantiomers such as hydrogen, π–π, and dipole–dipole interactions contribute to the successful enantiomer separation by polysaccharide CSPs . The cavity (produced by a single‐handed helical structure of polysaccharide formed by the glucose unit of CSPs) inside CSPs and the spatial adaptability of the solute also have important impacts on the stereoselectivity .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally considered that some evocable reaction between the chiral stationary phase and the enantiomers such as hydrogen, π-π, and dipole-dipole interactions contribute to the successful enantiomer separation by polysaccharide CSPs. 20 The cavity (produced by a single-handed helical structure of polysaccharide formed by the glucose unit of CSPs) inside CSPs and the spatial adaptability of the solute also have important impacts on the stereoselectivity. 21 Comprehensive effects of several interactions influenced the stabilities of the instantaneous diastereomeric complexes of chiral stationary phase and enantiomers and made a difference so that the enantiomers could be separated.…”
Section: Chiral Separations Under Reverse Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reversed‐phase HPLC, the influence of organic solvent volume fraction ( ϕ ) in mobile phase on retention and selectivity might be described using some dependences []. Methanolic mobile phase exhibited less elution strength and low efficiency compared to acetonitrile [] and gave poor chiral recognition ( k (S‐AMB) = 26.3; R = 1.31 and N = 385 for ϕ = 0.5). On the other hand, good chiral recognition was achieved using propan‐2‐ol but the substantial loss of efficiency was observed ( k (S‐AMB) = 3.79; R = 2.04 and N = 1445 for ϕ = 0.4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%