1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)91351-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic analyses of insulin biosynthesis in isolated rat and mouse islets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This material has been identified as mouse insulin II oxidized at methionine B29 (29), and for the purposes of calculating the relative amounts of the various insulin species is considered as mouse insulin II. As expected for the pancreas of a mouse ( 15,19), there was more than twice as much insulin II than I.…”
Section: Biochemistrysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This material has been identified as mouse insulin II oxidized at methionine B29 (29), and for the purposes of calculating the relative amounts of the various insulin species is considered as mouse insulin II. As expected for the pancreas of a mouse ( 15,19), there was more than twice as much insulin II than I.…”
Section: Biochemistrysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Despite the ease of separation of rat C-peptides I and II, and rat insulins I and II by HPLC [3][4][5][6], the separation of the two rat proinsulins has not proved as simple [3,6]. Based upon the dramatic change in mobility of rat insulin II following oxidation of Met B29, we speculated that [Met-OB29]proinsulin II may prove readily separable from both native proinsulin II and, more importantly, from rat proinsulin I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analytical method has allowed for separation of the protein products of the two non-allelic rat insulin genes, rat insulins I and II [3][4][5][6] and rat C-peptides I and II [7]. The separation of rat proinsulin I and II by HPLC proved not to be as successful [3,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully processed INS1 and INS2 peptides differ at the level of two B-chain amino acids, with additional differences evident in their C-peptides (Wentworth et al 1986). Despite sharing sequence homology upstream of the transcription initiation site (Wentworth et al 1986, Melloul et al 2002, Ins1 and Ins2 do have notable differences with respect to certain promoter elements, expression patterns, translational efficiency and imprinting status (Wentworth et al 1986, Linde et al 1989, Deltour et al 1995, Hay & Docherty 2006, Meur et al 2011, Mehran et al 2012. Ins2 can be detected earlier in murine development and has a broader tissue distribution (Deltour et al 1993, Fan et al 2009, Mehran et al 2012.…”
Section: Phylogeny and Complexity Of Insulin-like Peptides And The Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ins2 can be detected earlier in murine development and has a broader tissue distribution (Deltour et al 1993, Fan et al 2009, Mehran et al 2012. Murine Ins1 expression and promoter activity are largely restricted to the pancreas (Mehran et al 2012, Thorens et al 2015, and it does not contribute as much to pancreatic insulin production as Ins2, except in the mouse embryo during the early stages of pancreatic development (Wentworth et al 1986, Linde et al 1989, Deltour et al 1993, Bengtsson et al 2005. Complete inactivation of both Ins genes in mice (i.e.…”
Section: Phylogeny and Complexity Of Insulin-like Peptides And The Inmentioning
confidence: 99%