Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1002/srin.201300264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Transformation Mechanism of Martensite to Austenite in 00Cr15Ni7Mo2WCu2 Super Martensitic Stainless Steel

Abstract: The reverse transformation mechanism of martensite to austenite in 00Cr15Ni7Mo2WCu2 super martensitic stainless steel has been studied. The experimental results indicated that the volume fraction of reversed austenite in 00Cr15Ni7Mo2WCu2 super martensitic stainless steel increased first and then decreased with increasing tempering temperature over a range of 550–750 °C after quenching at 1050 °C. The reversed austenite formed along the martensite lath boundaries. When the tempering temperature was below 700 °C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model successfully predicted the austenite phase fraction during isothermal annealing in a range of alloys, but does not take multicomponent diffusion into account. Thus the well-documented solute partitioning during austenite reversion [8,[17][18][19][20], which according to Bojack et al is responsible for the two-step kinetics [22], is not reflected in such a model. Esin et al modelled two stage austenitization from cementite and ferrite in a lowalloy steel using the kinetics model for diffusion controlled transformations DICTRA [21].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model successfully predicted the austenite phase fraction during isothermal annealing in a range of alloys, but does not take multicomponent diffusion into account. Thus the well-documented solute partitioning during austenite reversion [8,[17][18][19][20], which according to Bojack et al is responsible for the two-step kinetics [22], is not reflected in such a model. Esin et al modelled two stage austenitization from cementite and ferrite in a lowalloy steel using the kinetics model for diffusion controlled transformations DICTRA [21].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of lamellar austenite was reported to be promoted by the establishment of an energetically favorable phase-interface (Kurdjumov-Sachs [12][13][14][15]), and might be affected by residual stress of the martensite transformation and grain-boundary segregation [16]. Partitioning of Ni is a well-documented mechanism of stabilizing reversed austenite to room temperature [8,[17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, the internal substructure of austenite [8] and the size and shape distributions of the austenite regions [10], were suggested to affect thermal stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of incorporating the Cr eq and Ni eq values into the ΔG → has been successfully used for studying the reversion mechanism in different ASSs [5,75,195,197,218,[222][223][224]. (17) Cr eq = Cr + 4.5Mo…”
Section: Reversion Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructures were determined by the reverse-transformation kinetics, which, in turn, was related to the cold deformation [17][18]. The metastable austenitic phase was transformed to the martensite after cold deformation, and the strain-induced martensite lath structure was destroyed preferentially via the large deformation to the refined structure during the cold rolling [16].…”
Section: Reverse Transformation Of Austenite After Annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%