2016
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Transfer of the Proximal Vascularized Fibula to Reconstruct the Lateral Malleolus: A Case Report and Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reverse-flow VFEG operative technique used in this patient is a one-stage procedure requiring no microvascular anastomosis which cannot only shorten operating time, but also reduce factitious damage of vessels 16 . However, it was controversial as to which artery was chosen to nourish graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reverse-flow VFEG operative technique used in this patient is a one-stage procedure requiring no microvascular anastomosis which cannot only shorten operating time, but also reduce factitious damage of vessels 16 . However, it was controversial as to which artery was chosen to nourish graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we had enough bone length remnant to maintain the proximal 8 cm of the fibula and ensure the proximal tibiofibular stability. Second, the proximal fibula had an identical contour to the distal fibula and sufficient strength (Gao et al, 2016). Finally, it was located on the same side of the defect, preventing the risk of contralateral donor site damage that could occur if a contralateral fibula flap was used for reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the rarity of this tumor location (Niimi et al, 2008), the literature regarding this matter is scarce. Classical options described include ligamentoplasties to the lateral tibia using the distal peroneal or tibialis tendons (Capanna et al, 1986; Dieckmann et al, 2011; Durak et al, 1996; Lamb et al, 2021; Marcove & Rosen, 1980; Monson et al, 2014; Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Shoji et al, 1970; Vaseenon et al, 2017; Yadav, 1981), tibiotalar arthrodesis (Dieckmann et al, 2011; Ozaki et al, 1997; Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Perisano et al, 2012; Saadon et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2020; Yin et al, 2015; Yoshida et al, 2017), fixation of the proximal fibula to the tibia (CARRELL, 1938; Persson & Rydholm, 1979), prosthethic ankle joint replacement (Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Perisano et al, 2012), reconstruction with distal fibular allografts (Jamshidi et al, 2013; Lubliner et al, 1985; Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Perisano et al, 2012; Saadon et al, 2017; San‐Julian et al, 2008; Wang et al, 2020), contralateral fibular autografts (Wang et al, 2020), iliac crest bone grafts (Eger et al, 2004; Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Perisano et al, 2012), rotating the ipsilateral proximal fibula 180° (Capanna et al, 1986; Dieckmann et al, 2011; Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Perisano et al, 2012; Saadon et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2020), and pedicled or free fibular flaps (Bibbo et al, 2015; Cavadas & Thione, 2015; de Gauzy et al, 2002; Gao et al, 2016; Panuel et al, 1997; Papagelopoulos et al, 2005; Rajacic & Dashti, 1996). Furthermore, there are case series in young patients in which no ankle reconstruction was performed, wit...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these techniques, at least theoretically, have different disadvantages. 2,4,7,14 Repair of a soft-tissue defect over the lateral malleolus secondary to severe trauma remains challenging for the orthopedic and plastic surgeon. Both lateral malleolus reconstruction and soft-tissue coverage are important for limb salvage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of stability and critical soft-tissue condition need reconstruction to achieve a stable ankle joint and sufficient skin coverage for this area. To overcome this problem, various methods have been described in different studies including ankle arthrodesis, 4 allografting, autologus iliac crest transplantation, 5 vascularized or nonvascularized proximal fibular graft, 1,2,7,9 scapular apophysis transplantation, 6 prosthetic reconstruction, 15 and combination reconstruction. 11 All of these techniques, at least theoretically, have different disadvantages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%