2019
DOI: 10.1177/0145561319825556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Squeeze Maxillary Sinus Barotrauma

Abstract: A young female patient presented to ear, nose, and throat clinic with long history of left sided facial pain exacerbated while flying and being in high altitude. Examination of nasal cavity and computed tomography scan of sinuses suggested left maxillary sinus barotrauma. Endoscopic sinus surgery was performed completely resolving her symptoms. Based on her symptoms and examination findings she had reverse squeeze sinus barotrauma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients most commonly present with severe sudden onset pain that is typically unilateral and over the affected sinus. 1,14,16,17 Our review supports this finding. The most common presentation amongst our patients was frontal pain, seen in 37% of patients.…”
Section: Presentationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patients most commonly present with severe sudden onset pain that is typically unilateral and over the affected sinus. 1,14,16,17 Our review supports this finding. The most common presentation amongst our patients was frontal pain, seen in 37% of patients.…”
Section: Presentationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Squeeze occurs during descent, which causes an increase in atmospheric pressure. Typically, the sinus ostia should be open to the nasal 30 1 13 1 1 Misirovs and Mohamad 14 1 27 1 1 Sung et al 18 1 30 1 1 Boston et al 25 9 34 8 1 9 Lachkar et al (2016) 31 1 26 1 Nagatani (2013) 32 1 26 1 1 Sanborn et al (2013) 33 1 81 1 1 Jeong et al 23 1 39 1 20 1 1 Mahabir et al 20 1 68 1 1 Segev et al 24 1 43 1 1 Parell and Becker (2000) 40 2 37.5 2 O'Reilly et al (1996) 42 39 n/a n/a n/a 39 Singletary and Reilly 16 1 25 1 1 Rodenberg 13 1 Skevas et al (2012) 28 Andrews et al (2010) 34 1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation