2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0648-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the gamma nail

Abstract: We studied 47 reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures that were treated with gamma nails between 1992 and 2000. Fracture reduction was satisfactory in 38 patients (81%), the hip screw position was correct in 42 (89%) and there were no peri-operative complications. However, in three patients the nail displaced, resulting in non-union in one and protrusion into the acetabulum in another. A logistical regression analysis of our series showed that an incorrect position of the hip screw in the femoral h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anteroposterior and lateral X-rays were obtained at each follow-up visit. Fracture union was defined as the presence of visible bone trabeculae between bone fragments in both views, accompanied by pain-free walking [24]. Patients' postoperative state was evaluated at each follow-up visit and compared with preinjury status using the Parker score, Barthel Index and EQ-5D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anteroposterior and lateral X-rays were obtained at each follow-up visit. Fracture union was defined as the presence of visible bone trabeculae between bone fragments in both views, accompanied by pain-free walking [24]. Patients' postoperative state was evaluated at each follow-up visit and compared with preinjury status using the Parker score, Barthel Index and EQ-5D.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, appropriate implants should be selected for fixation of the distal primary fragment, and postoperative stable reduction should be achieved. As clinical outcomes for the patients using SHS were poor, an intramedullary nail (IMN), such as SFN and long femoral nail (LFN), tended to be recommended [14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, it has not been clear whether LFN or SFN should be used in the different types of intertrochanteric fractures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…displacement. It should be noted that retention of the reduction during surgery is quite difficult and technically demanding [14][15][16]. In addition, appropriate implants should be selected for fixation of the distal primary fragment, and postoperative stable reduction should be achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Haidukewych et al (1), Rokito et al (2), and Henry et al (3) all believed that this device was not suitable for AO/OTA 31-A3 intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Treating these fractures with the intramedullary nail has an advantage with respect to mechanics and efficacy in clinical applications (4)(5)(6). However, it is not minimally invasive.…”
Section: And Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%