2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse Monte Carlo modeling: The two distinct routes of calculating the experimental structure factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the lack of short range order determines a one dimensional structure factor, which represents a problem in the structural determination in three-dimensional amorphous solids. Inverse methods such as Reverse Monte Carlo [118,119] or Empirical Potential Structure Refinement [120,121] can be used to reproduce and interpret data [122], since they provide a 3-dimentional atomic model which fits the measured data. The combination of modelling and experimental approaches can represent a major step forward to the interpretation of amorphous material diffraction data [123].…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the lack of short range order determines a one dimensional structure factor, which represents a problem in the structural determination in three-dimensional amorphous solids. Inverse methods such as Reverse Monte Carlo [118,119] or Empirical Potential Structure Refinement [120,121] can be used to reproduce and interpret data [122], since they provide a 3-dimentional atomic model which fits the measured data. The combination of modelling and experimental approaches can represent a major step forward to the interpretation of amorphous material diffraction data [123].…”
Section: Conclusion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMC protocol discussed previously has been used with various degrees of success in the study of the atomic structure of disordered materials like simple liquids [37], molten salts [38], glasses [39] and polymers [26,27]. The basic idea of the method, namely the comparison of a computer-generated model with experimental data following a stochastic set of pre-defined rules, has been extended to approaches that treat the intrachain contribution [6,31], the establishment of actual experimentally based force fields [40] and the role of crystallinity in the overall structure [14,41]. Extending the simulation towards coarser length scales and introducing crystals by arranging the segments in specified ways while keeping them consistent with the chain conformation have been seen to offer possibilities for an in-situ study of time-resolved crystallization [42,43], thus indicating the potential of such intimate coupling of an RMC-based procedure with experimental data [44,45].…”
Section: Rmc Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reverse Monte Carlo (RMC) method is a deceptively simple approach that allows for the extraction of detailed atomistic structural parameters of liquids and solids from diffraction data [12,13]. A number of variations of the base method has been proposed since its introduction, dealing with specific types of disordered materials, and more has recently been extended to incorporate the existence of crystals within the structure [13,14]. In this work, we will discuss the advantages of neutron scattering at small angles and deuterium labelling, and how this offers an approach to unlocking the secrets of the chain conformation and revealing the polymer structure on a multitude of length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed us to easily adapt it to the particularities of our system. More specifically, our code uses the N -RMC method, which is a variant of the RMC approach that allows for fluctuations of the number of particles and is specially suited to deal with highly confined systems. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%