2008
DOI: 10.1080/03091900600700749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse engineering techniques for cranioplasty: a case study

Abstract: This paper presents rapid prototyping and reverse engineering techniques applied to create an implant for the surgical reconstruction of a large cranial defect. A series of computed tomography (CT) images was obtained and purpose built software was used to extract the cranial geometry in a point cloud. The point cloud produced was used for: (a) the creation of a stereolithographic (STL) physical model for direct assessment of the cranial defect; and (b) the creation of a 3D mould model for the fabrication of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past 20 years or so, much has been achieved through research on the techniques to produce customized cranioplasty implants. 13,14,19,21,27,34,36,48,49,54,56 Nevertheless, these impressive techniques have generally remained in the respective laboratories and universities in which they were developed. This is because they require technical expertise as well as expensive, sophisticated software and machinery that are beyond the means of most surgeons and hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past 20 years or so, much has been achieved through research on the techniques to produce customized cranioplasty implants. 13,14,19,21,27,34,36,48,49,54,56 Nevertheless, these impressive techniques have generally remained in the respective laboratories and universities in which they were developed. This is because they require technical expertise as well as expensive, sophisticated software and machinery that are beyond the means of most surgeons and hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 With computer 3D modeling software and the patient's neuroimaging data, a mold can be designed, fabricated with this technology, and used to shape acrylic bone cement into an implant with good results. 27,36 Although promising, this method has not been widely adopted, at least in part due to limited access to expensive commercial and industrial 3D printers. The proliferation of low-cost desktop 3D printers has the potential to change this.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the patients' diagnostic and defective images with the aid of active contour model, and image registration techniques, were effective in modeling the skull's original shape. This approach differs from mirroring techniques, which assume that contralateral skull information is available [13,14,19,28]. However, patients with defects crossing the midsagittal plane of the brain, or those with a bilateral craniotomy do not fulfill this condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most popular one is the mirroring technique that duplicates the healthy counterpart section from the opposite side of the skull, as a model for the mold. Although this method has many applications [13,14,19,28], it uses the assumption of the ideal bilateral symmetry of the human skull [25]. Besides, mirroring is suitable only for the unilateral damage, and is unable to deal with bilateral defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overcoming such difficulties, the latest reverse-engineering technique is becoming the standard for medical modeling, using computed tomography (CT) images to reconstruct the anatomy of interest. 17 A GE Medical Systems Lightspeed VCT (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis) scanner was employed for the noninvasive extraction of high-resolution anatomic information of Myrtis' skull (the CT acquisition parameters were 120 KVp, 364 mAs, 21.2 cm field of view, 650 slices, slice increment 0.3 mm, 0.414 pixel size, and 512 3 512 image matrix size; Figure 2), while the Materialise Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) software was used to produce the skull model segmentation from the CT images. Threedimensional visualization was performed by means of triangulation of a segmented 3D area.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%