Reversals of the solar magnetic dipole in the light of observational data and simple dynamo models

Abstract

Context. Observations show that the photospheric solar magnetic dipole usually does not vanish during the reversal of the solar magnetic field, which occurs in each solar cycle. In contrast, mean-field solar dynamo models predict that the dipole field does become zero. In a recent paper it was suggested that this contradiction could be explained as a large-scale manifestation of small-scale magnetic fluctuations of the surface poloidal field. Aims. Our aim is to confront this interpretation with the available observational data. Methods. Here we compare this interpretation with Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO) photospheric magnetic field data in order to determine the amplitude of magnetic fluctuations required to explain the phenomenon and to compare the results with predictions from a simple dynamo model which takes these fluctuations into account. Results. We demonstrate that the WSO data concerning the magnetic dipole reversals are very similar to the predictions from our very simple solar dynamo model, which includes both mean magnetic field and fluctuations. The ratio between the rms value of the magnetic fluctuations and the mean field is estimated to be about 2, in reasonable agreement with estimates from sunspot data. The reversal epoch, during which the fluctuating contribution to the dipole is larger than that from the mean field, is about 4 months. The memory time of the fluctuations is about 2 months. Observations demonstrate that the rms of the magnetic fluctuations is strongly modulated by the phase of the solar cycle. This gives additional support to the concept that the solar magnetic field is generated by a single dynamo mechanism rather than also by independent small-scale dynamo action. A suggestion of a weak nonaxisymmetric magnetic field of a fluctuating nature arises from the analysis, with a lifetime of about 1 year. Conclusions. The behaviour of the magnetic dipole during the reversal epoch gives valuable information about details of solar dynamo action.

Does Nonaxisymmetric Dynamo Operate in the Sun?

“…We consider both, short and long correlation times. For the solar case, the short correlation time, τ ξ = 0.02P , is roughly equal to the correlation time of non-axisymmetric modes of solar magnetic fields (Pipin et al 2014). In addition, we consider the long correlation time, τ ξ = 0.5P .…”

Symmetries of Magnetic Fields Driven by Spherical Dynamos of Exoplanets and Their Host Stars

“…An observation of a substantial equatorial component of magnetic dipole at Uranus supports the idea that α 2 -dynamo may be an important option in a mechanism to excite the magnetic field of exoplanets. Strictly speaking, magnetic dipole for the αω-driven configuration can be directed in the equatorial plane at instants of magnetic field reversals (e.g., [49,50]) however this looks to be an unlikely option.…”

Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals

“…The evidence (based on three events) is not systematic: only one event (the reversal of solar cycle 22) has an overshoot, whereas the decay and growth appear to follow equal rates (their Figure 13). These high‐quality solar observations can be interpreted in the framework of dynamo theory, or using low‐dimensional models such as those discussed above; see also Pipin et al [] for an attempt at this exercise.…”