1975
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1537:rpaapw>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal pattern and apparent polar wander for the Late Jurassic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliable Jurassic poles for North America are few, the most reliable being the Callovian Summerville Formation (Steiner, 1978) and the Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian Morrison Formation (Steiner and Helsley, 1975). This was a time of rapid change of apparent pole position for North America (Steiner, 1975; in press), and the choice of direction for comparison of Leg 76 samples is therefore highly dependent on the age of the magnetization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reliable Jurassic poles for North America are few, the most reliable being the Callovian Summerville Formation (Steiner, 1978) and the Oxfordian-Kimmeridgian Morrison Formation (Steiner and Helsley, 1975). This was a time of rapid change of apparent pole position for North America (Steiner, 1975; in press), and the choice of direction for comparison of Leg 76 samples is therefore highly dependent on the age of the magnetization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a time of rapid change of apparent pole position for North America (Steiner, 1975; in press), and the choice of direction for comparison of Leg 76 samples is therefore highly dependent on the age of the magnetization. Inclinations at this site were computed for the Summerville and the two Morrison poles (see Steiner and Helsley, 1975) and are compared to the basalt inclinations for this site in Figure 6. The average inclination of Leg 76 samples best fits the upper Morrison direction, a Late Jurassic direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean poles and statistics are listed in Table 6. Dashed line tentatively connects poles for lower Morrison (lo‐Mor, ∼155 Ma) and upper Morrison (up‐Mor, ∼149 Ma) Formation of from Steiner and Helsley [1975] after correction for presumed inclination flattening corresponding to f = 0.55 and net 13° clockwise rotation of the Colorado Plateau relative to the craton of eastern North America (see text and Table 7). …”
Section: A New Composite Apw Path For the North America Cratonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in both compilations, the 20 Myr windows centered on 140 Ma and 150 Ma have few results and some are poorly defined with complicated magnetizations (e.g., Jura blue limestones). It is the results from the sedimentary Morrison Formation of Colorado [ Steiner and Helsley , 1975], that (although not listed by Besse and Courtillot [2002]) have been mainstays of Late Jurassic APW paths, and which merit attention. Steiner and Helsley [1975] found that the lithologic change that divides the sedimentary formation into two members marks a change of pole position; there are distinct lower Morrison (Oxfordian to early Kimmeridgian, ∼155 Ma) and upper Morrison (Kimmeridgian to early Tithonian, ∼149 Ma; age from Kowallis et al [1998]) poles (Table 7).…”
Section: A New Composite Apw Path For the North America Cratonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuparuk River sampling site shown by black star. Other published poles shown: -166Ma Moat volcanics pole (MV at 82"N,09OoE) from Van Fossen & Kent (1990); Late Jurassic Front Range Morrison pole (FRM, dashed small circle) from Van Fossen & Kent (1992b); 172 Ma Corral Canyon pole (CC at 62"N, 116"E) from May et al (1986); 151 Ma Glance conglomerate pole (G) from Kluth et al (1982); and late Jurassic Colorado Plateau Morrison Formation (LM: lower, UM: upper) fromSteiner & Helsley (1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%