2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal of desertification: The role of physical and chemical soil properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reversibility is suggested by a few recent studies, showing a recovery from desertification when the external pressure (grazing, in most cases) has been removed [30][31][32][33][34]. Some evidence for linearity are suggested in Figure 2, where the desertification process of the Sahara during the mid-Holocene is traced through the eolian dust record of Site 658C [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Reversibility is suggested by a few recent studies, showing a recovery from desertification when the external pressure (grazing, in most cases) has been removed [30][31][32][33][34]. Some evidence for linearity are suggested in Figure 2, where the desertification process of the Sahara during the mid-Holocene is traced through the eolian dust record of Site 658C [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Snyman (2004) concludes from the lack of climax grasses in the soil seed bank and their very low abundance in deteriorated vegetation that arid and semiarid rangelands reach a threshold of degradation, beyond which spontaneous recovery over the short-term is excluded. This is linked to sufficient infiltration rates supporting grass establishment (Allington and Valone, 2010), which are, however, reduced by prominent bare patches at DEG that are prone to crusting (Dreber and Esler, 2011).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Restoration Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In arid and semiarid ecosystems, recovery processes in degraded rangelands are slow and stochastic (Call and Roundy, 1991;Visser et al, 2004), and the time span for improvement might last several decades (Allington and Valone, 2010;Wiegand and Milton, 1996), which is beyond what is relevant for management. Both the time needed and the lack of a promising natural restoration potential at DEG to support species which are common to sustainably managed rangelands, point towards the need for active interventions.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Restoration Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly the most successful species to colonize disturbed areas has been D. viscosa, which has a great ability to germinate in eroded soil [40], generating organic matter and preventing the germination of other species [57]. In the absence of trampling, soil aggregate stability increases, which enhances infiltration, reduces erosion, and may promote nutrient accumulation and soil retention [58,59].…”
Section: Soil Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%