1986
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.490150214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reversal by estrogen of the effect of dorsal raphe stimulation on release of LH but not prolactin

Abstract: Electrical stimulation of the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) was administered to rats 2-4 weeks after ovariectomy and at least 7 days following implantation of a bipolar electrode. During stimulation the concentration of luteinizing hormone (LH) decreased whereas that of prolactin (Prl) increased in serial plasma samples obtained from the unanesthetized animals via a cannula chronically implanted in the right external jugular vein. Administration of estradiol benzoate (5 micrograms/100 g BW) for 2 days prior to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(4 reference statements)
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are consistent with previous reports of inhibitory effects of serotonin administration [15,19] or of activation by electrical stimulation of inhibitory path ways [1,8,17] on tonic LH release in gonadectomized rats, as well as with suggested stimulatory influences of seroto nin in the presence of estrogen [7,11,17], Unmasking of an inhibitory response to 5MEODMT by antagonism of 5HT: receptors provides evidence for activities in the ovariectomized animal of opposing modulatory influences mediated by 5FIT) and 5HTj receptors, both of which appear to be activated by systemic administration of 5MEODMT. Sim ilarly, the fact that in EB-primed animals morphine signifi cantly stimulated LH release only following the blockade of 5HTt receptors by KET provides further evidence for this dual receptor system, and suggests that the balance be tween them is shifted markedly by the steroid in favor of the stimulatory influence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present results are consistent with previous reports of inhibitory effects of serotonin administration [15,19] or of activation by electrical stimulation of inhibitory path ways [1,8,17] on tonic LH release in gonadectomized rats, as well as with suggested stimulatory influences of seroto nin in the presence of estrogen [7,11,17], Unmasking of an inhibitory response to 5MEODMT by antagonism of 5HT: receptors provides evidence for activities in the ovariectomized animal of opposing modulatory influences mediated by 5FIT) and 5HTj receptors, both of which appear to be activated by systemic administration of 5MEODMT. Sim ilarly, the fact that in EB-primed animals morphine signifi cantly stimulated LH release only following the blockade of 5HTt receptors by KET provides further evidence for this dual receptor system, and suggests that the balance be tween them is shifted markedly by the steroid in favor of the stimulatory influence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This phenomenon may be invoked to explain the differences in results observed in EB-primed animals versus unprimed ovariectomized animals: the can cellation of a significant morphine-induced decline in LH, and a reversal of a downward trend and replacement with a significant increase in response to 5MEODMT. The net stimulatory influence of 5HTagonism on LH release in EBprimed animals is in agreement with steroid modulation of responses to stimulation of the arcuate nucleus of the hypo thalamus [7] or dorsal raphe nucleus [17], and might suggest a common mechanism. Unfortunately, the magnitude of the estrogen-induced increase in sensitivity of the stimulatory mechanism precludes a definitive conclusion concerning which species of 5HT receptor might mediate the stimula tory effects of 5MEODMT in the presence of estrogen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the resumption of estrous cycles was accompanied by a delay in the preovulatory surges of LH and FSH and by a decrease in their serum concentrations. Similar changes have been observed in other experimental models [5,8,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The DR has been shown to participate in Received: October 17, 1986 Accepted after revision: March 20. 1987 the control of luteinizing hormone (LH) release [1,5,8,10,19,27], However, because of the wide variety of experimen tal models and strategies used in these studies, its physio logical role deserves further clarification. Moreover, the hypothalamic region through which the DR projections exert this control is still unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%