1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(96)01606-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revenue erosion through exemption and evasion in Cameroon, 1993

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, investment incentives are available only to projects above a minimum scale. Antitrust enforcement is typically weak and special tax breaks are sometimes meted out to large influential corporations (Gauthier and Gersovitz, 1997); 2) protectionist trade regimes are also more likely to favor large firms because these firms products compete more directly with imports, and because sectors with large firms lobby the government more effectively; 3) of lack of competition or enforcement of antitrust regulation that give incumbent-large firms advantage; 4) of high sunk costs barriers that small firms have difficulty at facing, e.g., costs of dealing with dense regulatory regimes are fixed and the payoffs for doing so increases with the scale of operations (Levenson and Maloney, 1997). Tybout (2000) reviews this literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, investment incentives are available only to projects above a minimum scale. Antitrust enforcement is typically weak and special tax breaks are sometimes meted out to large influential corporations (Gauthier and Gersovitz, 1997); 2) protectionist trade regimes are also more likely to favor large firms because these firms products compete more directly with imports, and because sectors with large firms lobby the government more effectively; 3) of lack of competition or enforcement of antitrust regulation that give incumbent-large firms advantage; 4) of high sunk costs barriers that small firms have difficulty at facing, e.g., costs of dealing with dense regulatory regimes are fixed and the payoffs for doing so increases with the scale of operations (Levenson and Maloney, 1997). Tybout (2000) reviews this literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs despite high tax rates due to tax evasion and exemptions (Gauthier and Gersovitz 1997;Gauthier and Reinikka 2006;World Bank 2004see Yang (2008 for evasion on import duties).…”
Section: Lose-lose Versus Win-win Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bureaucrats are heterogeneous, an extremely high value from the detection distribution must be selected to deter every public servant, which is an overly costly policy. An intermediate detection probability might be more 3 In Cameroon for instance, 34 % of manufacturing firms reported fearing being closed by tax officials, (Gauthier and Gersovitz 1997). 4 For a discussion and examples of bureaucrats' discretionary power over the private sector, see for instance Tanzi and Davoodi (2002) and Rose-Ackerman (1997, 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, biases in tax policy may favour the creation of smaller firms as a way of avoiding taxes and regulations. Gauthier and Gersovitz (1997) found evidence in Cameroon that small firms prefer to remain small and informal in order to avoid taxes, while large firms were influential enough to obtain special treatment. It was the mid-sized firms that bore the highest tax burden with the result that the distribution of firm size in Africa is characterised by a 'missing middle', which results in investment in Africa being less productive.…”
Section: Policy Failure and External Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%