2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp05347g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the role of interfacial heterogeneous nucleation in the metastable thin film growth of rare-earth nickelate electronic transition materials

Abstract: Although rare-earth nickelates (ReNiO3, Re≠La) exhibit abundant electronic phases and widely adjustable metal to insulator electronic transition properties, their practical electronic applications are largely impeded by their intrinsic meta-stability. Apart...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22,58−60 Once a region of the more stable phase nucleates, e.g., 4H in BSMO, the probability of its nucleation in that region immediately becomes preferred (possibly absolute), due to both its inherent bulk stability and its local epitaxial stability upon the preexisting stable phase deposit. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]58 From that thickness onward, the local probabilities of nucleation vary with respect to location depending on the structure of the pre-existing film in the local area, 58 and ultimately the film will convert completely to the stable (4H) phase with increased thickness, with some thickness range of mixed phase. That 40 nm films can be fabricated using iPLD indicates that any single-phase thickness value in rPLD is likely related to a thicknessdependent change in local nucleation probabilities, in a manner that decreases the preference for the epitaxially stabilized metastable phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…22,58−60 Once a region of the more stable phase nucleates, e.g., 4H in BSMO, the probability of its nucleation in that region immediately becomes preferred (possibly absolute), due to both its inherent bulk stability and its local epitaxial stability upon the preexisting stable phase deposit. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]58 From that thickness onward, the local probabilities of nucleation vary with respect to location depending on the structure of the pre-existing film in the local area, 58 and ultimately the film will convert completely to the stable (4H) phase with increased thickness, with some thickness range of mixed phase. That 40 nm films can be fabricated using iPLD indicates that any single-phase thickness value in rPLD is likely related to a thicknessdependent change in local nucleation probabilities, in a manner that decreases the preference for the epitaxially stabilized metastable phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, epitaxial stabilization of a bulk metastable phase occurs because there is a change in thermodynamic stability during nucleation, primarily arising from the low-energy (high-energy) interface between the metastable (stable) phase and a substrate or pre-existing deposit. In addition to the area-specific interface energy, there is the thickness-dependent volumetric (bulk and epitaxial strain) energy. Xu et al and Zhou et al have shown through a first-principle investigation that, respectively, for TiO 2 and (Ba/Sr)­MnO 3 polymorphs, epitaxial stability on differently oriented (Ba/Sr)­TiO 3 substrates can accurately reproduce experimental trends by including an interface energy term along with the bulk formation and strain energies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations