2019
DOI: 10.1101/666370
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the neural networks that extract conceptual gestalts from continuously evolving or changing semantic contexts

Abstract: AbstractReading a book, understanding the news reports or any other behaviour involving the processing of meaningful stimuli requires the semantic system to have two main features: being active during an extended period of time and flexibly adapting the internal representation according to the changing environment. Despite being key features of many everyday tasks, formation and updating of the semantic “gestalt” are still poorly understood. In this fMRI study we used naturalis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(169 reference statements)
5
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in our experiment, integration unfolded over time, with semantic decisions occurring roughly 2 ​s after the presentation of the cue. A recent study by Branzi and others (2019) suggests that ventral AG supports the integration of meanings during time-extended narratives (see also Bonnici et al., 2016 ; Ramanan et al., 2017 ). Future research should establish whether semantic integration that emerges over time leads to a different pattern of activation along the principal gradient compared with the integration of simultaneously-presented information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, in our experiment, integration unfolded over time, with semantic decisions occurring roughly 2 ​s after the presentation of the cue. A recent study by Branzi and others (2019) suggests that ventral AG supports the integration of meanings during time-extended narratives (see also Bonnici et al., 2016 ; Ramanan et al., 2017 ). Future research should establish whether semantic integration that emerges over time leads to a different pattern of activation along the principal gradient compared with the integration of simultaneously-presented information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast the anterior vLPC (PGa) showed structural connectivity with temporal lobe language processing areas (5,30,31). Indeed, the same region has been shown to be positively engaged by tasks that involve sentence-level processing (1,35,36). Whereas, the posterior vLPC (posterior PGp) connected with the occipital lobe and medial parietal areas associated with visual attention (2,34), and this same region has been shown to be positively engaged by a picture-sequence task (35).…”
Section: Summary Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pMTG shows increased engagement for processing verbs relative to nouns and is also involved in the neural representation of tools and actions (Bedny et al, 2008;Caspers et al, 2010;Peelen et al, 2012;Ishibashi et al, 2016). AG, in addition, has been implicated in the processing of meaningful stimuli that are extended in time, such as sentences, narratives and action sequences (Humphries et al, 2006;Lerner et al, 2011;Humphreys and Lambon Ralph, 2017;Branzi et al, 2020). This has led to claims that this region is essential for combinatorial semantic processes, in which individual word meanings are integrated into a coherent global representation (Humphries et al, 2006;Bemis and Pylkkänen, 2012;Price et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%