2020
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-020-00864-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing the microbial assemblage structure in the human gut microbiome using latent Dirichlet allocation

Abstract: Background: The human gut microbiome has been suggested to affect human health and thus has received considerable attention. To clarify the structure of the human gut microbiome, clustering methods are frequently applied to human gut taxonomic profiles. Enterotypes, i.e., clusters of individuals with similar microbiome composition, are well-studied and characterized. However, only a few detailed studies on assemblages, i.e., clusters of co-occurring bacterial taxa, have been conducted. Particularly, the relati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both parameters continued to partition the community without reaching a clear optimum; we therefore presented the first 10 subgroups, also to allow for comparison with the results of topological analysis. The perplexity parameter not reaching a clear optimum is unexpectedly consistent with recent publications using LDA in microbial ecology ( 47 49 ). Bacterial probability distributions (ranked by a probability of ≥1% in descending order) across the subgroups are displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both parameters continued to partition the community without reaching a clear optimum; we therefore presented the first 10 subgroups, also to allow for comparison with the results of topological analysis. The perplexity parameter not reaching a clear optimum is unexpectedly consistent with recent publications using LDA in microbial ecology ( 47 49 ). Bacterial probability distributions (ranked by a probability of ≥1% in descending order) across the subgroups are displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a third method, we tested the LDA potential to stratify gut microbiota of the cohort participants. This unsupervised machine learning technique is increasingly finding acceptance in the field of microbiome studies ( 47 49 ) for its unique ability to reveal latent or hidden groups within the data cloud. Figure S4 in the supplemental material shows the LDA model’s perplexity parameter and log-likelihood values to find the optimal number of clusters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its versatility, there exist many LDA-based models that are widely used in the field of bioinformatics [ 24 , 25 ]. Among them, supervised LDA [ 20 ] should be noted as an extended model closely related to this research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we advocate using deep learning models that have already proven adept at transfer learning in natural language processing (NLP) to better understand baseline interactions present in microbiome data ( 19 – 21 ). There exist easily drawn parallels between natural language data and microbiome data, namely, that documents are equivalent to biological samples, words to taxa, and topics to microbial neighborhoods ( 22 24 ). While other language-inspired algorithms such as topic modeling methods have been employed to identify latent variables in microbiomes, deep learning approaches offer the unique advantage that they scale with the amount of data available, allowing our understanding and our predictive models to scale alongside the genomic revolution ( 25 ).…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%