Revealing the degradation mechanism of the lanthanum nickelates based double‐layer electrodes during long‐term tests in contact with chromium‐containing steel interconnects

Abstract

Summary This paper focuses on the long‐term tests for 1000 hours of different Membrane‐Electrode‐Interconnect Assemblies (MEIAs), consisting of a steel interconnect and an asymmetrical solid electrochemical cell based on the Ce0.8Sm0.2O2−δ electrolyte, the double‐layer working electrode with the La2NiO4+δ – Ce0.8Sm0.2O2−δ composite functional layer and the LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3−δ current collector layer, and the platinum reference electrode (O2, LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3−δ|La2NiO4+δ – Ce0.8Sm0.2O2−δ|Ce0.8Sm0.2O2−δ|Pt, O2). These tests were carried out on MEIAs with two types of Cr‐based stainless steels, Crofer 22 APU and 08X17T, with and without protective coatings at 850°C in air. The electrochemical performance of MEIAs was studied without polarization as well as under cathodic and anodic polarization (current density was 0.5 A cm−2) by means of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and the distribution of relaxation times method (DRT). It was found that the proposed protective coatings for the stainless steels inhibit chromium poisoning without polarization and under anodic polarization: for Crofer 22 APU the degradation of the polarization resistance after ~1100 hours of exposure was 0.35 ± 0.05 Ω cm2, and for 08X17T it was from 0.40 ± 0.05 Ω cm2. In the case of cathodic polarization, the degradation of the polarization resistance remained at a very high level, comparable to uncoated samples: for Crofer 22 APU and 08X17T with coatings, it was about 0.6 to 0.8 Ω cm2 after ~1100 hours. Post‐test analysis of the microstructure and chemical composition of the interconnect ‐ double‐layer electrode interface was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), wavelength dispersive X‐ray spectrometry (WDS), and respective image analysis of the obtained data. The influence of chromium poisoning on the degradation was considered for different stages of the electrode performance. It was demonstrated that chromium predominantly accumulates in the current collector layer in the case of anodic polarization and in the functional layer in the cases of open circuit and cathodic polarization. For the first time, a combined electrochemical‐chemical degradation mechanism of the La2NiO4+δ – Ce0.8Sm0.2O2−δ functional layer was discussed. Highlights Long‐term tests of Membrane‐Electrode‐Inteconnect Assembles (MEIAs) were done. Chromium poisoning was detected on MEIAs with the interconnects without coating. Cathodic polarization terminates the protective properties of the coatings. Chromium poisoning decreases electrode activity to oxygen exchange and diffusivity. A combined electrochemical‐chemical degradation mechanism of the functional layer was revealed.

Segregation and interdiffusion processes in perovskites: a review of recent advances

“…[227][228][229] The cation interdiffusion of ions with interconnectors is associated with a current layer on the cathode side in oxidizing atmospheres or on the anode side with a cermet anode or nickel current collector in reducing atmospheres. [230][231][232][233] One of the main tasks in the development of electrochemical device technology is to suppress the degradation processes oen associated with interconnector materials and to ensure low specic contact resistance. The use of Cr-based metal interconnectors is complicated by the evaporation of volatile chromium particles from the interconnectors and its interaction with the electrodes.…”

Superior Electrochemical Performance of a Ce0.8Gd0.2O2−δ/Zr0.8Sc0.2O2−δ Thin Bilayer-Protected Gadolinium-Doped Ceria Electrolyte in Intermediate-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

“…In contrast, the pulsed laser deposition (PLD) method can deposit high-quality thin films without high-temperature annealing . It also has many added advantages, including easy control of chemical composition, high deposition rate, short test period, and uniform film . At present, the thickness of the bilayer electrolytes prepared by PLD is in the “μm” level. , …”

“…21 It also has many added advantages, including easy control of chemical composition, high deposition rate, short test period, and uniform film. 22 At present, the thickness of the bilayer electrolytes prepared by PLD is in the "μm" level. 23,24 In this study, a nano-thickness GDC/ScSZ bilayer was designed as an isolation mechanism on a dense GDC electrolyte.…”

“… 21 It also has many added advantages, including easy control of chemical composition, high deposition rate, short test period, and uniform film. 22 At present, the thickness of the bilayer electrolytes prepared by PLD is in the “μm” level. 23 , 24 …”