2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revealing plant cryptotypes: defining meaningful phenotypes among infinite traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using all traits can node be distinguished separately from species? Such a framework is consistent with developmental genetic theory that differences in leaf shape between species versus more conserved heteroblastic changes in leaf shape within individual plants are regulated by distinct genetic pathways [16] that lead to separable morphological effects within single leaves (so-called “cryptotypes” [46]). We also note that the LDAs performed use the “leave one out” approach of cross-validation, in which a separate LDA for each leaf, minus the leaf in question, is used to predict the identity of that leaf.…”
Section: Analysessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Using all traits can node be distinguished separately from species? Such a framework is consistent with developmental genetic theory that differences in leaf shape between species versus more conserved heteroblastic changes in leaf shape within individual plants are regulated by distinct genetic pathways [16] that lead to separable morphological effects within single leaves (so-called “cryptotypes” [46]). We also note that the LDAs performed use the “leave one out” approach of cross-validation, in which a separate LDA for each leaf, minus the leaf in question, is used to predict the identity of that leaf.…”
Section: Analysessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Shade avoidance most closely aligns with genes responsible for differentiating leaf primordia from the meristem and patterning leaf complexity, in particular LeT6 (Janssen et al, 1998;Kim et al, 2003;David-Schwartz et al, 2009), and is distinct from heteroblastic changes mediated by TCPs and CUCs (Ori et al, 2007;Efroni et al, 2008;Berger et al, 2009;Rubio-Somoza et al, 2014) or evolutionary changes mediated by BOP or other KNOX-related pathways (PETROSELINUM and BIPINNATA; Kimura et al, 2008). The morphology of any tomato leaf is the result of contributions of separate developmental, genetic, and environmental effects Chitwood and Topp, 2015), modulated by distinct molecular pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Not only is the shape of a single leaf highly multivariate, but the shape of leaves within and between plants is influenced by evolutionary, genetic, developmental, and environmental factors (Chitwood et al, 2012a(Chitwood et al, , 2012b(Chitwood et al, , 2013Chitwood and Topp, 2015). Over a lifetime, a plant will produce numerous leaf shapes, influenced by the development of individual leaves as their blades unequally expand (allometric expansion; Hales, 1727;Remmler and Rolland-Lagan, 2012;Rolland-Lagan et al, 2014) and the different types of leaf shapes a plant produces at successive nodes, a result of the temporal development of the shoot apical meristem (SAM; heteroblasty; Goebel, 1900;Ashby, 1948;Poethig, 1990Poethig, , 2010Kerstetter and Poethig, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single images can capture data on hundreds of individuals, entire populations, and mixed communities, simultaneously aiding the linkage of genes to traits. The broader collection of gene‐to‐trait associations can be integrated in network models to form a systems biology view of the trait combinations and their correlations underlying phenotype expression and adaptation (Chitwood & Topp, ).…”
Section: Developing Resources For a Tractable Sphagnum Model System Wmentioning
confidence: 99%