Revealing different understandings of soil held by scientists and farmers in the context of soil protection and management

Abstract

DisclaimerThe University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights.The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT.This is a peer-reviewed, post-print ( DisclaimerThe University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights.The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT.1 Revealing different understandings of soil held by scientists and farmers in the context of soil protection and management AbstractThis paper aims to analyse and draw together results from similar studies in England, Switzerland and France which investigated farmers' understanding of soil and compared it with that of scientists, researchers and advisors (collectively called scientists in this analysis). A range of methods were used across the three studies and different theoretical approaches, looking at forms of knowledge, local practice of knowledge production and conceptions of reality, were employed to explain the results. Despite the different contexts, methodologies and theoretical approaches in the three studies, the results reveal similar patterns of difference in farmer and scientist understanding of soil. In the English study farmers demonstrate a 'knowhow' form or intuitive working knowledge of soil while advisors rely on scientifically established forms of 'know-why' and seek to understand and explain soil processes. Similarly in the Swiss study farmers' and scientists' differing perceptions are directed and shaped by their respective aims, methods and context of work. In the French study farmers and researchers are shown to have different conceptions of soil, they attr...

Understanding the influence of farmer motivations on changes to soil erosion risk on sites of former serious erosion in the South Downs National Park, UK

“…In terms of spatial awareness, our findings generally support those reported by Ingram et al (2010, in relation to Mathieu's French study), that most farmers lack awareness of the wider erosiongenerating processes beyond their farms, focusing instead on risks on their own properties, although there were some notable exceptions. The majority of farmers do not think at a landscape scale with regard to erosion risk, with only a small minority employing a wider spatial erosion strategy with regard to cropping patterns, ensuring that there are no swathes of the same crop in the same field, valley or vicinity.…”

“…social capital - Sobels et al, 2001) and knowledge cultures (Tsouvalis et al, 2000) might also be added here. All are informed by how farmers themselves understand their soils, particularly vis-à-vis scientific perspectives (Baginetas, 2008;Ingram et al, 2010;Duruiheoma, et al, 2015), and with reference to cultural norms and social symbolism (e.g. Schneider, et al, 2010 and in a wider context, Burton, 2004).…”

Are Australian and United States Farmers Using Soil Information for Soil Health Management?

“…For positive changes in soil health and agroecosystem sustainability to occur, the farmers are the most important people of influence, because ultimately it is their actions that will determine the state of the soil [66]. Researchers, educators and policy-makers must address the best "means to an end" by which they can achieve this.…”

“…Clearly, what one group (scientists) considers routine is quite different to another (industry bodies). The contrast in perception of soil understanding between scientists and farmers is well documented in Ingram et al [66,67], and even though farmers may have the "know-how" they do not necessarily have the "know-why". They found advisors were critical of farmers' soil management, saying "they did not know how to examine their soil to determine how much cultivation is required".…”

The Relevance of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Approaches for Assessing Adaptive Capacity and Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems

“…Managers' strategies are largely influenced by their perceptions of the ecological, economical and social environments of SES [1]. These influences have been particularly pointed out and studied in the agricultural context [3,4,9]. In order to help farmers in managing their farm, Decision Support Systems (DSS) have been developed by 'management scientists' [13].…”