1985
DOI: 10.3109/00016488509108900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction

Abstract: Revascularized iliac bone has advantages over other revascularized bone grafts for the reconstruction of large mandibular defects. This is a detailed anatomical study of the blood supply to the iliac bone using microfil and Batson injection methods. It confirms and extends Taylor's study. Clinical results are reported for six cases of extensive mandibular defects which were reconstructed using this method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27][28][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Free flaps have several advantages over other reconstructive options: they allow transfer of vital tissue with characteristics of size, composition, and volume to fulfill the reconstructive needs; moreover, free flaps can be shaped to reconstruct properly the tridimensional volume of the defect and, conversely to pedicled flaps, have considerable degrees of freedom because their positioning is not limited by the arc of rotation of the pedicle. [26][27][28]30,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]45 The autonomous vascular supply of free flaps, furthermore, makes this reconstructive option suitable for reconstruction of unfavorable recipient sites, such as large and complex defects (involving bone and soft tissues), irradiated fields, areas of necrosis/fibrosis secondary to previous surgery, injury, or infection, and provides higher tolerance to infections and to adjuvant treatments (radiochemotherapy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Free flaps have several advantages over other reconstructive options: they allow transfer of vital tissue with characteristics of size, composition, and volume to fulfill the reconstructive needs; moreover, free flaps can be shaped to reconstruct properly the tridimensional volume of the defect and, conversely to pedicled flaps, have considerable degrees of freedom because their positioning is not limited by the arc of rotation of the pedicle. [26][27][28]30,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]45 The autonomous vascular supply of free flaps, furthermore, makes this reconstructive option suitable for reconstruction of unfavorable recipient sites, such as large and complex defects (involving bone and soft tissues), irradiated fields, areas of necrosis/fibrosis secondary to previous surgery, injury, or infection, and provides higher tolerance to infections and to adjuvant treatments (radiochemotherapy).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could interfere with needle advancement during USG‐FNB. A DCIA with an external diameter of about 3 mm at its origin (Taylor et al, ; Fredrickson et al, ; Yaginuma et al, ; Shimizu et al, ) located around the inguinal ligament and heading toward the ipsilateral ASIS in a straight configuration (Fig. ) can be visualized during USG‐FNB using the in‐plane lateral to medial approach as a linear hypoechoic structure between the fascia iliaca and fascia lata.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%