2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0073-47212007000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revalidação de Cathorops arenatus e Cathorops agassizii (Siluriformes, Ariidae), bagres marinhos das regiões norte e nordeste da América do Sul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, during the incubation period, males enlarge the branchial chamber, reduce the number of teeth, and modify the epithelium that covers the oral cavity (Gudger, 1916;Dimitrenko, 1970). All these differences are observed in the species of Cathorops, which have additional modifications not found in other ariid species, such as head larger and wider in males than in females (Marceniuk, 1997;2007a;2007b). These differences may be associated with the smaller body sizes, on average, attained by the species of Cathorops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, during the incubation period, males enlarge the branchial chamber, reduce the number of teeth, and modify the epithelium that covers the oral cavity (Gudger, 1916;Dimitrenko, 1970). All these differences are observed in the species of Cathorops, which have additional modifications not found in other ariid species, such as head larger and wider in males than in females (Marceniuk, 1997;2007a;2007b). These differences may be associated with the smaller body sizes, on average, attained by the species of Cathorops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The subgenus Cathorops, within which the species described here are included, can be diagnosed from the subgenus Precathorops and from other ariid genera by possessing a lateral ethmoid and frontal limiting a wide conspicuous fenestra, visible under the skin (vs. moderately developed in Precathorops, Amphiarius, Aspistor, Bagre, Galeichthys, Notarius, and Potamarius or reduced or absent in Genidens, Sciades, and Occidentarius), mesethmoid, lateral ethmoid and frontal lacking bony spinulations (vs. bony spinulations present in Precathorops), posterior cranial fontanel very reduced (vs. moderately developed, long and narrow in Precathorops, Notarius, and Potamarius, large and long in Amphiarius and Aspistor, or absent in Sciades), vomerine tooth plates absent (vs. present in Precathorops, Aspistor, Bagre, Galeichthys, Notarius, Occidentarius, and Sciades), accessory tooth plates bearing molariform teeth (vs. conical in Precathorops, and in other ariid genera except Aspistor), posterior cleithral process short (vs. moderate length in Precathorops and other ariid genera), and Key to the species of Cathorops from the Mesoamerica and Caribbean Sea distinguished from A. fissus by having a shorter head, larger teeth and larger accessory tooth plates. The characters used to diagnose A. arenatus are typical of females, whereas the condition found in A. fissus is characteristic of males (Marceniuk, 2007b). The latter species is currently considered junior a synonym of the former.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Cathorops spp.) is still under revision and may have contributed to differences in taxa aggregation (Kailola, ; Marceniuk, ; Marceniuk and Betancur, ). Additionally, the sampling sites used in our study were closer to the coastline and located in shallower waters relative to those sampled by previous authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification and delineation of species in the sea catfish family Ariidae has been recognized as the most problematic of all siluriform groups (Ferraris, 2007), and many taxonomic revisions for ariids during the past century were until recently treated as provisional (e.g., Taylor & Menezes, 1978;. A great degree of nomenclatural confusion is attributed to the strong similarity in external appearance of many ariid species, a problem that is further exacerbated by ontogenetic variation and sexual dimorphism (Marceniuk, 2005(Marceniuk, , 2007Betancur-R. et al, 2008). In recent years, morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies have improved our understanding of ariid relationships, leading to more objective classification schemes (Betancur-R., et al, 2007;Marceniuk & Menezes, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%