2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reuse of industrial and agricultural by-products as pozzolan and aggregates in lightweight concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leveraging locally available and naturally available cob earthen material (clay soil, sand, straw, water mixed in a plastic state) in place of conventionally processed building materials such as concrete masonry and wood wall assemblies for load-bearing walls has the potential to reduce energy use, carbon emissions, air acidification, and particulate matter emissions by 70–90% . Adopting alternative cement binders or geopolymer cements made using secondary raw materials, such as fly ash, kaolin, calcined clays, zeolite, etc., by the activation of alkali solutions emits lower amounts of greenhouse gases and can replace the conventional Portland cement. , Concrete made using recycled concrete; industrial or agricultural byproducts; recycled crushed clay brick aggregate; and cement-replacing materials such as rice husk ash, palm oil fuel ash, and palm oil clinker powder can save carbon emissions when compared with conventional concrete. Utilizing degraded municipal solid waste or rice husk ash in fired bricks has been shown to result in energy savings. , Ramesh et al found that using aerated concrete blocks in walls and roofs in place of burnt clay bricks and integrating photovoltaic panels in the building has the potential to reduce the energy use of the building by 10 and 40%, respectively. Although beyond the scope of this study, it is important to conduct an economic analysis to assess whether the adoption of greener materials also results in cost savings or whether it results in increased costs …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveraging locally available and naturally available cob earthen material (clay soil, sand, straw, water mixed in a plastic state) in place of conventionally processed building materials such as concrete masonry and wood wall assemblies for load-bearing walls has the potential to reduce energy use, carbon emissions, air acidification, and particulate matter emissions by 70–90% . Adopting alternative cement binders or geopolymer cements made using secondary raw materials, such as fly ash, kaolin, calcined clays, zeolite, etc., by the activation of alkali solutions emits lower amounts of greenhouse gases and can replace the conventional Portland cement. , Concrete made using recycled concrete; industrial or agricultural byproducts; recycled crushed clay brick aggregate; and cement-replacing materials such as rice husk ash, palm oil fuel ash, and palm oil clinker powder can save carbon emissions when compared with conventional concrete. Utilizing degraded municipal solid waste or rice husk ash in fired bricks has been shown to result in energy savings. , Ramesh et al found that using aerated concrete blocks in walls and roofs in place of burnt clay bricks and integrating photovoltaic panels in the building has the potential to reduce the energy use of the building by 10 and 40%, respectively. Although beyond the scope of this study, it is important to conduct an economic analysis to assess whether the adoption of greener materials also results in cost savings or whether it results in increased costs …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lightweight concretes and mortars are irreplaceable in the construction industry because of their low weight, low thermal conductivity, good acoustic insulation function, fire resistance, etc. [13,14]. In particular, their low weight is a significant benefit allowing structures, such as beams, columns, etc., to be slimmed down, thus providing new technical solutions contributing to material and financial savings [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of thermal insulation, this material has rather poor properties. For this reason, in modern construction, lightweight concrete is increasingly used, which offers much better thermal insulation parameters compared to regular concrete at the expense of lower mechanical strength [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%