1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb02834.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reuse of Agricultural Drainage Waters: An Economic Analysis1

Abstract: The profitability of reusing agricultural drainage water for crop production depends on the salt tolerance of the crop being grown the salt concentration of the drainage water, the cost of obtaining it and price of good water. In the this paper the economics of drainwater resue is examined for six crops in two areas of southern California. The results suggest that drainwater reuse is not profitable for the fruit and vegetable crops considered but is profitable for the field crops considered when the price of g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A value of$150 per acre-foot was used, based on Stroh (1990) and adjusted to 1987 price level, for drainage treatment costs in the case of no river disposal (Strategy III). The additional cost associated with reuse was assumed to be $15 per acre foot after Knapp, Dinar, and Letey (1986), and adjusted for inflation since 1987. Where pd was taken to be = 0 for Strategies I and II where farmers are not restricted with the disposal ofthe drainage water.…”
Section: Economic Evaluations Of the Case Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A value of$150 per acre-foot was used, based on Stroh (1990) and adjusted to 1987 price level, for drainage treatment costs in the case of no river disposal (Strategy III). The additional cost associated with reuse was assumed to be $15 per acre foot after Knapp, Dinar, and Letey (1986), and adjusted for inflation since 1987. Where pd was taken to be = 0 for Strategies I and II where farmers are not restricted with the disposal ofthe drainage water.…”
Section: Economic Evaluations Of the Case Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 A/10 3 m 3 (Table 3). Knapp and Dinar (1984) estimated the price of irrigating with drainage water on the basis of the cost of the energy required for lifting drainage water and generating sufficient head for furrow irrigation. Considering a typical storage pond with a depth of 4 .…”
Section: Price Of Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the first to analyze the efficacy of mixing waters were Parkinson et al [1970]; however, they considered only predetermined blending combinations. For Feinerman and Yaron [1983] and Knapp and Dinar [1984] blending was endogenous and, depending on prices and crops' salinity tolerance, could become optimal at the regional and field levels, respectively. However, in both of those studies, salinity was the only factor affecting production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%