2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3ee00658a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reunderstanding aqueous Zn electrochemistry from interfacial specific adsorption of solvation structures

Abstract: Although sulfate- and sulfonate-based electrolytes have been widely used in the study on aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs), the discrepancies in the Faradaic reaction kinetics of cations interfacial chemistry including Mn2+...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By measuring the pressure difference and the streaming potential, the zeta potential of bare Zn (−8.195 mV) and Zn-CCS (−2.763 mV) could be calculated by Helmholtz–Smoluchowski formula as eq : ζ = 4 π η ε · UX Δ P · G where ζ is the zeta potential (V), η the viscosity of the medium (Pa s), ε the dielectric constant (F m –1 ), U the streaming potential (V), X the conductivity (A V m –1 ), Δ P the pressure difference (Pa), and G the correction factor. Lower potentials indicated that the charge distribution at the Zn-CCS interface was changed and the adsorption of anions was significantly weakened in the same environment. , Besides, Zn-CCS was rich in hydrophilic functional groups and had a network-like surface with a high specific surface area, which made it have good wettability to aqueous electrolytes than bare Zn (89°) and was beneficial for the Zn ion diffusion (Figure i) . Among this, the surface morphology becomes flat from unevenness as the electrodeposition time grows with the continuous generation of Zn-CCS, and thus, the apparent contact angle continues to increase (30 s–37°, 60 s–44°, 90s-50°, 120s-52°, 150s-68°, 180s-73°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By measuring the pressure difference and the streaming potential, the zeta potential of bare Zn (−8.195 mV) and Zn-CCS (−2.763 mV) could be calculated by Helmholtz–Smoluchowski formula as eq : ζ = 4 π η ε · UX Δ P · G where ζ is the zeta potential (V), η the viscosity of the medium (Pa s), ε the dielectric constant (F m –1 ), U the streaming potential (V), X the conductivity (A V m –1 ), Δ P the pressure difference (Pa), and G the correction factor. Lower potentials indicated that the charge distribution at the Zn-CCS interface was changed and the adsorption of anions was significantly weakened in the same environment. , Besides, Zn-CCS was rich in hydrophilic functional groups and had a network-like surface with a high specific surface area, which made it have good wettability to aqueous electrolytes than bare Zn (89°) and was beneficial for the Zn ion diffusion (Figure i) . Among this, the surface morphology becomes flat from unevenness as the electrodeposition time grows with the continuous generation of Zn-CCS, and thus, the apparent contact angle continues to increase (30 s–37°, 60 s–44°, 90s-50°, 120s-52°, 150s-68°, 180s-73°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower potentials indicated that the charge distribution at the Zn-CCS interface was changed and the adsorption of anions was significantly weakened in the same environment. 30,31 Besides, Zn-CCS was rich in hydrophilic functional groups and had a network-like surface with a high specific surface area, which made it have good wettability to aqueous electrolytes than bare Zn (89°) and was beneficial for the Zn ion diffusion (Figure 2i). 32 Among this, the surface morphology becomes flat from unevenness as the electrodeposition time grows with the continuous generation of Zn-CCS, and thus, the apparent contact angle continues to increase (30 s−37°, 60 s−44°, 90s-50°, 120s-52°, 150s-68°, 180s-73°).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the protection of the Zn anode has received increasing attention to improve the overall performance of the aqueous Zn 2+ batteries. 19–21…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) have gained increasing attention owing to their low redox potential (−0.76 V vs standard hydrogen electrode) and promising theoretical specific capacity (820 mA h g –1 ) with low cost and high safety. However, the strong electrostatic interaction between the bivalent zinc ion and intercalation material seriously obstructs the development of cathode materials . As host materials for just commercialized sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) have also been recognized as one of the most prospective cathode materials for AZIBs not only due to their unique 3D open framework structure and large interstitial sites capable of hosting alien Zn 2+ but also owing to their high working voltage, rich redox-active sites, low cost, and environmental friendliness. The most representative PBAs are metal hexacyanoferrate (M a HCF) with a general formula of A x M a [Fe(CN) 6 ] y □ 1– y ·nH 2 O, where A, M a , and □ denote removable cations (Li + , Na + , K + , Zn 2+ , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%