Returns to public agricultural and rural investments in China

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review China’s past returns in a period over the last 40 years to public agricultural and rural investments to highlight the importance for future strategic investments in China’s agri-food system and in rural areas. Design/methodology/approach The paper synthesizes research findings from previous studies and reviews more recent trends. Based on the main findings, the authors provide forward-looking guidance for China’s investments agriculture and rural areas in the context of emerging global and domestic trends in agriculture, food security, and nutrition. Findings Public investments in the agricultural research and development (R&D), rural education, and rural infrastructure have been shown to have significant positive returns to agricultural growth as well as to reductions in poverty and regional inequality. Returns to overall agricultural GDP were highest for agricultural R&D, followed by education, roads, and telephones. Investment in education had the greatest returns to poverty reduction, as well as to nonfarm GDP and overall rural GDP. Investment in agricultural R&D had the second greatest returns in term of poverty reduction, and was also a close second in returns to nonfarm GDP and overall rural GDP following education. The rural infrastructure spending also saw significant returns to poverty reduction, largely through growth in agricultural and nonagricultural sectors. Investments in agriculture and rural areas will continue to be important, as China and the world face emerging challenges amidst a changing global landscape, particularly regarding climate change, rapid urbanization, nutritional imbalances, and food safety concerns. In addressing these emerging challenges, continued support for agricultural R&D and innovations can play a key role. Originality/value The paper highlights research findings on key investment areas that will be increasingly important for China’s agri-food system, and provides guidance in the context of emerging trends impacting food security and nutrition.

Conservation payments, off-farm employment and household welfare for farmers participating in the “Grain for Green” program in China

“…Ferreira and Lanjouw, 2001; Liu, 2017). People with higher educational levels are generally more knowledgeable about employment opportunities, more adaptable to a range of tasks, more ready to acquire new skills and more likely to gain off-farm wage employment (Beyene, 2008; Fan et al , 2018).…”

Linking agriculture to nutrition: the evolution of policy

“…But far more work is still needed, so that global and national policies can be informed by high-quality evidence. Fan et al (2018) reviewed evidence of returns of public investments and their impact on agricultural growth and poverty reduction. Similar studies are needed to evaluate impact of public investment on nutrition improvement.…”

Reforming Agricultural Support for Improved Environmental Outcomes

“…Both OECD and non-OECD countries provide public goods such as agricultural research and innovation investments and rural infrastructure. The benefit-cost ratios for these interventions have been found to be generally substantially greater than one (Mogues et al 2012;Alston 2018;Fan, Cho and Rue 2018), with the highest rates of return to investments in research and development. By contrast the benefit-cost ratio for subsidies is almost by definition less than one because of the deadweight costs associated with inducing high-cost production and distorting consumer choices (through changing domestic prices).…”