2019
DOI: 10.1002/app5.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns to education in India: Capturing the heterogeneity

Abstract: The aim of this article is to estimate the marginal rates of return to various levels of education in India, across the entire wage distribution. For this purpose, unit level data from the 68th round of the National Sample Survey Organisation (India) for the year 2011-2012 have been used, and the technique of quantile regression has been applied. Average estimates were ignored, and the heterogeneity in rates of return was captured across the following disaggregations: (a) all India, public and private sectors,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative sign of experience squared indicates that the marginal returns to experience diminish over time. These findings further emphasise the previous findings of Blaugh (1972), Tilak (1980Tilak ( , 1987, Psacharopoulos (1985Psacharopoulos ( , 1989Psacharopoulos ( , 1994, Kingdon (1998), Kingdon and Unni (2001), Duraisamy (2002), Bhandari and Bordoloi (2006), Kingdon and Theopold (2008), Agrawal (2011), Fulford (2014), Singhari and Madheswaran (2016) and Mitra (2019) that education and experience are major drivers of wage in the labour market.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The negative sign of experience squared indicates that the marginal returns to experience diminish over time. These findings further emphasise the previous findings of Blaugh (1972), Tilak (1980Tilak ( , 1987, Psacharopoulos (1985Psacharopoulos ( , 1989Psacharopoulos ( , 1994, Kingdon (1998), Kingdon and Unni (2001), Duraisamy (2002), Bhandari and Bordoloi (2006), Kingdon and Theopold (2008), Agrawal (2011), Fulford (2014), Singhari and Madheswaran (2016) and Mitra (2019) that education and experience are major drivers of wage in the labour market.…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Hence individuals with tertiary education earn more than those who has an incomplete or primary education, or has no education at all. This result supports the college premium hypothesis and indicates that returns to tertiary education is higher than the lower levels of education (Wang et al 2019;Mitra 2019). Whilst analyzing returns of education across gender, one may see that the tertiary education has a highly significantly impact on women earnings.…”
Section: Returns To the Level Of Educationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We, however, feel this is unlikely to be valid explanation for our results for two reasons. First, labour market returns and consumption returns to education of women, even at relatively low educational levels, are quite high in India, and in fact, they are higher than that of the men(Fulford, 2014;Mitra, 2019). Thus, even if an increase in age in marriage leads to modest gains in education, this should get translated into better labour market outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%