2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1435213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returns from Social Capital in Open Source Software Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contributors are usually located in different geographical areas. Thus, OSS projects mostly have online repositories, e.g., GitHub, that allow multiple developers to contribute independently to the project [ 4 ]. Over the last two decades, OSS development has gained popularity, and we have witnessed successful OSS projects such as Linux, MySQL, and Hadoop.…”
Section: The Case Of An Oss Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The contributors are usually located in different geographical areas. Thus, OSS projects mostly have online repositories, e.g., GitHub, that allow multiple developers to contribute independently to the project [ 4 ]. Over the last two decades, OSS development has gained popularity, and we have witnessed successful OSS projects such as Linux, MySQL, and Hadoop.…”
Section: The Case Of An Oss Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantities of SC can be used to replace interpersonal trust among agents and that is due to when an organization generates positive values of SC, constituent agents gain benevolence and behave in a trusting manner [ 3 ]. Other benefits of SC are enhanced group communication, efficient use of intellectual capital, better collective action and easy way of accessing resources [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies have been done at the level of individual developers, though many of the same concerns apply. For example, co-membership in projects can be viewed as a social network (e.g., Méndez-Durón and García, 2009), but strong theory is needed to interpret the network. Conversely, since data are available longitudinally, there is an opportunity to perform stronger tests of theory (e.g, Subramaniam et al, 2009).…”
Section: The Special Issue Opens With a Comprehensive Review And Syntmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing research on FLOSS has addressed a variety of questions focusing on aspects ranging from open source development processes [Feller, 2001;Scacchi et al, 2006] and developer motivation [Hann et al, 2004] to economic and policy-making implications [Méndez-Durón, 2009]. Because the new domain was so large and diversified, at least two research agendas were proposed in order to investigate it: Feller and Fitzgerald's [2000] proposal was more focused on development processes, while Niederman et al [2006a and2006b] faced a wider scope drawing a more detailed agenda.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%