2014
DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2014.944849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returning to the Infinite—Kohut’s Empathy, Levinas’s Other, and the Ethical Imperative: Discussion of Articles by Doris Brothers and Joseph Lichtenberg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others, like myself, believe that Levinas can help psychoanalysts think ethically in the clinic (Marcus, 2010; Orange, 2011). In the psychoanalytic literature, Levinas is often read alongside innovative psychoanalysts: Bion (Emery, 2000), Ferenczi (Orange, 2011), Kohut (Orange, 2011; Rizzolo, 2017; Sucharov, 2014), Lacan (Barnard, 2002; Critchley, 1998; Ruti, 2015); Winnicott (Alford, 2000, 2002, 2007; Orange, 2011). I believe that the work of Lacan and his student Laplanche can help to rethink Levinasian ethics in relation to clinical work through the critique of hermeneutics as the form of clinical work itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, like myself, believe that Levinas can help psychoanalysts think ethically in the clinic (Marcus, 2010; Orange, 2011). In the psychoanalytic literature, Levinas is often read alongside innovative psychoanalysts: Bion (Emery, 2000), Ferenczi (Orange, 2011), Kohut (Orange, 2011; Rizzolo, 2017; Sucharov, 2014), Lacan (Barnard, 2002; Critchley, 1998; Ruti, 2015); Winnicott (Alford, 2000, 2002, 2007; Orange, 2011). I believe that the work of Lacan and his student Laplanche can help to rethink Levinasian ethics in relation to clinical work through the critique of hermeneutics as the form of clinical work itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%